Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rocketry/Titles/Round 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was implement --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 09:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Details

[edit]

This is a follow-up to the original renaming proposal. Due to changes made to that proposal and to the Wiki after the first round of voting had opened, and errors in the original proposal, several articles that should have been moved were not. This proposal is to rectify this, and move those articles in line with the new de facto standards for article naming. This should be uncontroversial, but I have opted to discuss the move beforehand incase there are any unexpected objections. A vote will only be held on this proposal if there are objections raised during the discussion phase, on which an agreement cannot be reached. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 21:24, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

[edit]

Splits

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g The "(rocket family)" disambiguator was added too late in the original proposal to include this move
  2. ^ a b To keep in line with other rockets in the same family
  3. ^ Accidentally omitted from original proposal
  4. ^ Technically not a missile
  5. ^ a b Article was created after proposal had been made

Discussion

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Comments after closure

[edit]

What was the reason for the SS-N-23 → R-29RM Shtil and R-29RMU Sineva split? Both are very small articles and both missiles seem to have the same NATO designation.Offliner (talk) 16:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note

[edit]