Zizhu chuangxin (Chinese: 自主创新; pinyin: zìzhǔ chuàngxīn; literally: "endogenous and/or indigenous innovation") is a term frequently used in China by the Chinese government, academics, and businesses to describe the Chinese technology-led economic transformation in the past decades.
The two terms (( '自主' - Zizhu in English means 'self-governed' or 'self-determined', and '创新' (Chuangxin means 'innovation' (noun) or 'innovate' (verb)) are separate terms. However, they had a very interesting and profound meaning from the point of view of evolutionary economics.
The expression is increasingly becoming an international topic of discussion. The Chinese government, led by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), aimed to transform China into a scientifically and technologically advanced country by the year 2020 , when it would possess self-driven 'unique' scientific and technological capabilities, as well as intellectual properties. The Chinese government had increasingly invested into science and innovation related projects throughout the 10th, 11th and 12th National Five Year Plans
The term Zizhu chunagxin 自主创新 (hereby roughly translated as 'Indigenous Innovation') first appeared in 1994 when Dr. Chen Jin referenced the term in his research on technologically-led innovation in the electronic industry in China. It has been increasingly used since 2006 after Hu Jintao, General Secretary of China Communist Party, President of People's Republic of China and Wen Jiabao, Premier of People's Republic of China declared to develop China to become an 创新型国家 translated as 'Innovation-oriented' nation by Suttmeier et al. (2006). How to identify and develop (nurture) self-motivated indigenous capabilities 自主创新能力 among individual, enterprises, research organizations and universities become hot topics among Chinese government, academics, and business circles.
So far academics  in China do not come to any conclusion on the appropriate English translation of the term, however, most popular translations include but not limited to the followings:
(1) Endogenous Innovation (from neo-classical economics perspective, also from growth theory);
(2) Indigenous Innovation (from evolutionary economics, resource based view perspectives);
(3) Others including 'Self-reliant Innovation'; 'Self-determined Innovation'; 'Self-oriented Innovation'; 'Self-directed Innovation'; and 'Independent Innovation'.
In the United States, the pioneering research on how technological-led indigenous innovation evolved in China was done by late Dr. Qiwen Lu. In Lu's (PhD 1997, Harvard, US) thesis on the emergence and growth of three of China's major computer companies, Stone, Legend, and Founder (also see Lazonick 2004), his approach on the theory of innovative enterprise in China was developed. Lu's book on 'China's Leap into the Information Age' was published by Oxford University Press in 2000, with updated analyses of Stone, Legend, and Founder as well as the inclusion of the case of Great Wall. Lu died shortly after the publication.
In China, publications on science and technological innovation started to accumulate from 1993 (Nian 2000) and the concept of National Systems of Innovation started to develop led by several research organizations in China such as China State Council Development Research Center (DRC) 国务院发展研究中心; Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASIPM) and Tsinghua University.
In March 2013, Xi Jinping, the General Secretary of the China Communist Party called for a strong innovation-led growth in the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) National Committee Meeting, see Xinhua (2013). The China innovation policy is expected to continue and lead the country from low cost, production-led economy (low- to medium-technology industries) gradually move on to 'Knowledge Based Economy' (medium- to high-technology product or service economy).
However, the discussions on Zizhu chuangxin did not touch much on the traditional industries from evolutionary economics perspective which characterized by their highly original, traditional and/or cultural-rich knowledge and practices. Indigenous knowledge and skills as assets were used, improved and still play a key part in many traditional sectors in developed and emerging countries (e.g., food & drink sector; cultural and entertainment sector). Lai in his PhD study (PhD 2013, Manchester, UK)  investigated the case of Chinese medicine's innovation processes and used the term 'Indigenous Innovation' to differentiate it from the technological-driven innovation perspective.
National Indigenous Innovation Capability (NIIC): 国家自主创新能力 Guójiā Zìzhǔ chuàngxīn Nénglì
The term 自主创新能力 (Chinese: 自主创新能力; pinyin: Zìzhǔ chuàngxīn nénglì; literally: "Indigenous Innovation Capabilities (IIC)") had been translated by scholars as independent; self-reliant or self-determined innovation capabilities.
This is one of core concepts of China science and technological-led developments after Hu Jintao, Chairman of China Communist Party and People's Republic of China announced the strategic direction of China developments from 2006 to 2020 in January 2006.
国家自主创新能力 (National Indigenous Innovation Capability, NIIC) is defined here as high-level (national and provincial based), complex and dynamic capabilities development concept in innovation policy and management studies reference to China context as an emerging socialistic country with a capitalistic economy.
NIIC is derived from the concept of 自主创新. Scholars and writers had various understandings. This is a kind of original capability (or a system of local self-created capabilities) that 'enable innovation of products and processes' developed mainly from within a national context. The government encouraged individuals (e.g. scientists, researchers, engineers and entrepreneurs) and organizations (research institutes, universities and enterprises) within China to identify, engage and use various resources, e.g. experience, knowledge and skills (available from within organization or network to collaborate and create highly sustainable, hard to imitate knowledge, capabilities and other tangible and intangible values (and various levels of inter-connected competitiveness).
Science and technological innovation has been highly emphasized by the China government in the 10th and 11th Five Year Plan (2001–2011) and also in the 12th Five Year Plan 2011–2016. In 2013, the China State Council issued the policy document on the 'Comment on Strengthening and Enhancing Enterprise as the Key Player in Technological Innovation' as step forward to confirm its determination to push enterprise to be the center of technological innovation in the future economic developments (China State Council 2013).
For the concepts of evolutionary economics and innovation, see [Joseph Schumpeter|Schumpeter] (1934); creative destruction see Metcalfe (1998); for dynamic capabilities, see Teece and Pisano (1994) and Teece, Pisano, and Shuen (1997); on system of innovation, see Nelson (1993); China system of innovation, please see Gu and Lundvall (2009). For the theory of innovative enterprise, see Lazonick (2010).
For the concept of indigenous systems of innovation (on technological-led innovation policies in developing economies), please see 
- Chinese Government (2006), Link: http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-02/09/content_183787.htm accessed 21 August 2011
- Chen (1994), From Technological Importation to Self-Innovative Learning Mode, Science Research Management, Issue 15, No.2, Mar 1994.
- Suttmeier et. al (2006), China's Innovation Challenge and the Remaking of the Chinese Academy of Sciences', Innovation, Summer 2006. MIT Press.
- Gao and Xu (2011), The Status Quo of Independent Innovation Researches of Enterprise and Analysis therefore: Based on Five Perspectives (www.paper.edu.cn accessed 21 August 2011)
- China Daily Online (2006), Link: http://theory.people.com.cn/GB/40557/56837/index.html accessed 21 August 2011
- Lazonick (2004), Indigenous Innovation and Economic Development: Lessons from China's Leap into the Information Age, Industry and Innovation, Vol.11 No.4, page 273-297
- Nian, 连燕华 (2000), National Innovation System - a new analytical framework, Studies of Science of Science, Vol.18 No.4, page 71-75
- Xinhua News (2013), Xi urged innovation driven growth. Retrieved 4 March 2013, from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-03/04/c_132207617.htm
- Lai (2013), 'Systems of Innovation: Case Study on How Traditional Chinese Medicine build Knowledge and Capability through Collaborations.' PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
- Xin Hua News (2006), Link: "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 23 August 2011. Retrieved 23 August 2011. accessed 22 August 2011
- China State Council (2013a). "China State Council Comment on Strengthening Enterprise as Main Body of Technological Innovation, Upgrade of the Enterprise on Innovative Capability." Retrieved 6 February 2013, from http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-02/04/content_2326419.htm
- Schumpeter (1934), Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press.
- Metcalfe Stanley J (1998), Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction, The Graz Schumpeter Lectures Series, No.1, Routledge: London & New York, p.3, 8, 17, 95, 114.
- Teece and Pisano (1994), Dynamic Capabilities of the Firms: An Introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.3, No.3, p.537-556.
- Teece D J, Pisano G, and Shuen A (1997), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18:7, p. 509-533.
- Nelson, R. R., Ed. (1993). National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Gu, Shulin., BA Lundvall, et al. (2009). "China's System and Vision of Innovation: An Analysis in Relation to the Strategic Adjustment and the Medium- to Long-Term S&T Development Plan (2006-20)." Industry and Innovation 16(4-5): 369-388
- Lazonick, William (2010). "The Chandlerian Corporation and the Theory of Innovative Enterprise". Industrial and Corporate Change. 19 (2): 317–349. doi:10.1093/icc/dtq005.
- Metcalfe and Ramlogan (2005), Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 48, p. 433-446