User talk:HarviP

This is HarviP's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:HaryanaBlogs/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HaryanaBlogs! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account from editing. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 22:16, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PMMVY Article edit

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HarviP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Point 1. amount mentioned in the original article is wrong i.e. 6000 is wrong and contribution given by govt is 5000 so i have corrected it. 2. I have added additional information on scheme which is missing from orginal artical Point 2. Qualification & Documents required for availing scheme is an important part of the scheme which is missing and should be there or reference should be there. I have added info and reference. I don't think deletion or blocking is justifiable. HaryanaBlogs (talk) 08:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)e[reply]

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@HaryanaBlogs You were blocked because of your username, not your edits. Your username implies a connection with [Haryana Blogs], which is against Wikipedia's policy. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 09:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I request change of this username? If possible. HaryanaBlogs (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HaryanaBlogs See the block message:

If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 09:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

HarviP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

HarviP (talk · account availability check · rename user)

Request reason:

As per WikiPedia policies username seems a promotional name so please change HaryanaBlogs (talk) 09:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=HarviP}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=HarviP | 3=As per WikiPedia policies username seems a promotional name so please change HaryanaBlogs (talk) 09:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC) | 4=~~~~}}

[reply]

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=HarviP | reason=As per WikiPedia policies username seems a promotional name so please change HaryanaBlogs (talk) 09:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC) | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

[reply]

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=HarviP | reason=As per WikiPedia policies username seems a promotional name so please change HaryanaBlogs (talk) 09:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC) | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

[reply]

@UtherSRG: was the username the only problem or do they need to address something else too? 1AmNobody24 (talk) 11:51, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They have made several unsourced edits, as well as some that were simply improperly sourced. Also, blogs are not reliable sources so should not be used. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]