User talk:WhyIsItWereHere22

October 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hillary Clinton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism, as you did at Hillary Clinton. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WhyIsItWereHere22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will refrain from making edits such as these again. As you can see in my only other significant contribution, the creation of No_Stone_Unturned_(2013_album), I was able to create an article that cited sources and paid attention to detail, showing that I as an editor can be compatible with Wikipedia's standards.

Decline reason:

Did you really need to be told such edits are unacceptable? I rather doubt that. I'm also rather unimpressed by the article you present as an example of you being able to cite sources - iTunes is hardly reliable and the remaining source predates the subject of the article by more than a decade and thus cannot be relevant. Huon (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WhyIsItWereHere22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If I can find a credible source for my article, would that add credibility to my request?

Decline reason:

Possibly, but unfortunately either way this account cannot be unblocked. Even if this account were clear to be unblocked from its current block I would immediately reblock it as a username violation; please see {{uw-ublock-famous}} for more information. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 21:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WhyIsItWereHere22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

WhyIsItWereHere22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

You aren't blocked due to your username. Further requests can be made via WP:UTRS. Talkpage access has been revoked due to abuse of the unblock-un template. SQL ^{Query me!} 05:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SQL: Er, that's my fault. See his second unblock request above. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:51, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ks0stm: - Welp. I'm sorry Bob_Dylan1963 in that case. I'll restore the request below. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

WhyIsItWereHere22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

WhyIsItWereHere22 (talk · account availability check · rename user)

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=WhyIsItWereHere22}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=WhyIsItWereHere22 | 4=~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=WhyIsItWereHere22  | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=WhyIsItWereHere22 | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

Proposed deletion of No Stone Unturned (2013 album)

The article No Stone Unturned (2013 album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability for this iTunes-only "album"; the only non-iTunes source predates the album by more than a decade and thus cannot have anything to say about it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 19:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]