User talk:Masonbarge

Welcome, from Journalist

Welcome!

Hello, Masonbarge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

^{Journalist ^C./ ^{Holla @ me!}}

Blues

On 3 Sept you added to blues the following:

Other influences on rock and roll are often cited, especially country music and R&B. It is more accurate to say, however, from a musical perspective, that artists in these musical subgroups adapted blues structure and harmony to their distinctive styles, accents, and vocabularies.

Another editor has not understood what you meant and has changed it to:

Other influences of the blues are often cited, especially country music and R&B. It is more accurate to say, however, from a musical perspective, that artists in these musical subgroups adapted blues structure and harmony to their distinctive styles, accents, and vocabularies.

Perhaps you would like to reword it to reinstate your intended meaning but making the paragraph easier to understand. cheers. Nurg 05:50, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dachshund

Thanks for your additions to the Dachshund articles. Could you identify the source(s) for the statements about the popularity of the breed in the U.S. and in NYC specifically so that we can have a "Reference" section listing the source? Thanks. Elf | Talk 16:46, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to nutrition!

You contributed to the Science Collaboration of the Month that has just ended its run.
Thanks, and let's keep improving it so it may become a Featured Article!

- Samsara _contrib ^talk 12:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey, I just wanted to drop you a note thanking you for your vote (even though it's against me!). But I appreciate that somebody read my points, and took them into consideration. Thanks! --Hyphen5 00:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tip of the day project update

Just trying to get things better organized around there. Toward that end, I've created a task list template for the project. If all the contributors to the project placed it on their user page, we could all keep in touch more easily (with announcements, alerts, etc.). It, and the latest announcements can be found at:

totd task list template

--Go for it! 17:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guilloché

Thank you very much, for bettering the Guilloché page; your good work is highly appreciated.

Bloger 18:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Oranges

I'm sorry you're feeling a bit offended, but you shouldn't get too frustrated at it. Yes, I basically just cut out all your work, but this is Wikipedia. Anything you type in can be changed or removed. Also, just because it's valid info, does not mean it should go in that particular section. While reading it, I interpreted the description as an variety that belongs to a very specific region. There are probably hundreds of varieties of oranges out there, and we can't list everything. Giving a small list of the most common varieties seen throughout the world is the starting point. This isn't a US centric Wikipedia. We can't apply some sort of bias at all. This is a fundamental policy. - Zero1328

Affiche rouge

Hello Apollo! You might want to review, if you have some time, my recent NPOVing and copy-editing of the Affiche rouge and correct any mistakes or insert any comments, critical or not. Regards, Tazmaniacs 15:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chewco

I was reading Chewco, and there's a sentence of yours that doesn't parse:

Additionally, as investors became more wary of Chewco, Michael Kopper, an Enron employee who reported to CFO Andrew Fastow.

There must be something missing there. Evercat 23:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected it and expanded the article. Thanks for the heads-up. Apollo 16:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tracy middendorf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tracy middendorf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shadroe.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shadroe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:17, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Winslet attitudes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Winslet attitudes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:17, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RCC or CC

You took part in Talk:Catholic Church/Archive 3#REQUESTED MOVE to Catholic Church there is a new requested move see Talk:Catholic Church#Requested Move --PBS (talk) 08:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Christophers

You wrote in the article The Christophers,

Devoted to the American constitutional, Fuller avoided theology and philosophy, going "straight for the watcher's heart."

What noun does the adjective "constitutional" modify? — Walloon (talk) 12:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected 19:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Castine tugboat.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Castine tugboat.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:57, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it.

The image is accompanied by a full description. I don't get what you want.Apollo (talk) 20:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History of taxation in the United Kingdom

A useful article. As it goes back to Roman times and is mostly not to do with the UK, I'm wondering what we can do about the title. Would you be happy with History of taxation in Britain? Moonraker2 (talk) 01:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sworn vs. unsworn declarations

Would you please take a look at my comments at Sworn_declaration#Isn.27t_this_completely_backwards.3F? Thanks. jhawkinson (talk) 05:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK

Sorry, I'm not very active on Wikipedia any more and I just got this. I did a full response on the page. In a nutshell, this is a massive headache because the terms are not used consistently across jurisdictions.Apollo (talk) 20:04, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mammon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert Barnes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to All Things Bright and Beautiful may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*http://www.hymntime.com/tch/htm/a/l/l/t/allthing.htm Words & music] at the Cyber Hymnal

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking

if you've seen the "new" stuff on Alexandra Land, e.g.

I think I'll post this at User talk:Jimbo Wales as well.

Smallbones_(smalltalk) 20:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Masonbarge. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Masonbarge. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Smell the Glove for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smell the Glove is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smell the Glove (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Kawnhr (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedee.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pedee.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 11:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]