A section that contains the phrase Accusations of... or Allegations of...
A classic case of bad sanitized writing to try to please all parties. See WP:YESPOV. An article often can and should be written in a neutral way which gives equal time to points of view based on their weight, and yet is not so sanitized. These statements usually say everything at once, while simultaneously saying nothing at all. They tell the reader what Ann Coulter has said about something rather than what legitimate authorities, the scientific community, etc. has said about something. We must remember: someone's toes will be stepped on, and by sanitizing or removing the truth, we do the reader a disservice.
A section detailing an issue which is overly important to the editors of Wikipedia. The demographic nature of Wikipedia is the young, western, English speaking, educated internet user, who's point of view is different than the general population of the world. These people in general have a stronger sentiment against global warming, sci-fi/fantasy and anime fiction, etc..
Southern Baptist Convention, good example: there is no criticism section present, despite being a controversial organization, and its stances on controversial issues are properly in context, not cherry-picked, and not recentist.
Focus on the Family, bad example: there is a particularly uninhibited criticism and controversy section, which seems to simply be a vent against the organization. It contains a hodgepodge of criticisms only since 2006 (quite recentist), and they deal mainly with homosexuality, to the near exclusion of the many many other issues with this organization (political activism, alleged anti-Semitism, anti-abortion activism, anti-feminist, etc.)
I award you this barnstar for all of your anti-vandalism work. I have always seen you making edits and I think its amazing that you have compiled so many edits in such a short amount of time. I have only been here since June and this is the first time I have addressed your talk page but after seeing all the work you have done I feel I have an obligation to give you this barnstar.Southern Texas 00:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
The Mighty Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Your efforts are very much appreciated. MONGO 00:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For tirelessly fighting vandals and reporting them at WP:AIV. Happy editing, SnowolfHow can I help? 08:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
The Minor Barnstar
For your "conscience attack" -- for allowing civility to win out over your lesser nature -- I award you this little barnstar. Water it with kindness and it will grow! – Quadell(talk) (random) 14:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You always seem to be one minute ahead of my Vandal reverts. Well done Lantrix (talk) 15:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
.svg){kind=small}
