User talk:Mugs2109

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NOTE: DO NOT POST Discussion/Talk regarding a particular page here — use that page's Discussion/Talk. Mugs2109 20:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Mugs2109! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Wazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz upRuhrfisch ><>°° 13:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

USS General J. H. McRae (AP-149)/USAT General J. H. McRae[edit]

I wanted to thank you for your addition to the USS General J. H. McRae (AP-149) article.

Hi there. I just assessed Test Stand VII as B-class. It is a very good article following your rewrite and could probably be assessed higher than that, but just wanted to let you know. I also had a question about an image where you did an impressive amount of work and referencing. See Commons:User talk:Mugs2109. I'd be interested to know what you think about that. Carcharoth (talk) 11:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: For Discussion/Talk regarding a particular page, please use that page's Discussion/Talk. Mugs2109 20:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spitfire operational history[edit]

Thanks for adding your interesting information on Test Stand VII and some of the background.

AfD nomination of Fort Bliss, Texas[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Fort Bliss, Texas, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Bliss, Texas. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eastmain (talk) 22:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just gave it an assessment, and it meets all the B-class criterion (FYI WP:MILHIST doesn't recognize list-class). RockManQ (talk) 02:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So good job! RockManQ (talk) 02:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: DO NOT POST Discussion/Talk regarding a particular page here — use that page's Discussion/Talk. Mugs2109 20:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Operation Pointblank[edit]

Please discuss major changes on the talk page before making them. A comment in the edit history such as "Added Infield citation and 'Point Blank Target Systems'" is totally inadequate for such major changes to the page. To date you have not made one comment on the talk page of the Operation Pointblank. AFAIC since the start of the year you have not discussed one edit that you have made to any article, as you make major difference to pages which are on occasions reverted, I suggest that you start to discuss these reversions on the talk pages of the articles concerned because not to do so is disruptive to the project as you do not try to gain a consensus for the changes that you make. I would usually have discussed the changes you made to the Operation Pointblank before reverting your changes, but to date every time I have asked you to discuss changes that you make you have not done so. So before making any more changes to Operation Pointblank please propose the changes you wish to make on the talk page and lets discuss them to see if we can agree that the changes you propose would improve the article. -- PBS (talk) 11:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss substantial pages to the page before making them. --PBS (talk) 13:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite Plan for Completion of Combined Bomber Offensive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 21:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]