User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:06, 28 August 2013

: 632

: 82

: 6

: 22

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.

Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.

Archive

Talk archives:

Extended content

Archive 1 (created Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (created Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (created May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (created July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (created September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (created November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (created January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (created 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (created 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (created 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (created 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (created 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (created 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (created 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (created 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 created 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (created 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (created 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (created 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (created 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (created 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (created 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (created 8 April, 2008), Archive 24 (created 15 May, 2008), Archive 25 (created 8 July, 2008), Archive 26 (created 5 October, 2008), Archive 27 (created 4 January, 2009), Archive 28 (created 19 March, 2009), Archive 29 (created 12 May, 2009), Archive 30 (created 20 July, 2009), Archive 31 (created 11 October, 2009), Archive 32 (created 1 December, 2009), Archive 33 (created 25 March, 2010), Archive 34 (created 29 July, 2010), Archive 35 (created 1 November, 2010), Archive 36 (created 24 January, 2011), Archive 37 (created 12 May, 2011), Archive 38 (created 28 September, 2011), Archive 39 (created 16 November, 2011), Archive 40 (created 12 February, 2012), Archive 41 (created 23 April, 2012), Archive 42 (created 7 July, 2012), Archive 43 (created 27 September, 2012), Archive 44 (created 8 February, 2013), Archive 45 (created 21 April, 2013), Archive 46 (created 13 June, 2013), Archive 47 (created 26 September, 2013), Archive 48 (created 27 December, 2013), Archive 49 (created 20 March, 2014), Archive 50 (created 8 June, 2014), Archive 51 (created 2 September, 2014), Archive 52 (created 24 November, 2014), Archive 53 (created 20 April, 2015), Archive 54 (created 21 September, 2015), Archive 55 (created 4 March, 2016), Archive 56 (created 25 August, 2016), Archive 57 (created 22 December, 2016), Archive 58 (created 1 May, 2017), Archive 59 (created 1 March, 2018), Archive 60 (created 10 July, 2018), Archive 61 (created 6 March, 2019), Archive 62 (created 13 November, 2019), Archive 63 (created 23 March, 2020), Archive 64 (created 1 September, 2020), Archive 65 (created 13 February, 2021) add new archive

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Current RfAdminship

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
Numberguy6	0	0	0		01:36, 1 June 2024	6 days, 20 hours	no	report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report

Last updated by ^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} at 04:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Warsaw

Thanks for the DYK nomination, but it was much premature. I'm working on it, but it would take time to finish it properly. So far there's little on the actual battle there. //Halibu tt 00:26, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed that, if only temporarily. //Halibu tt 07:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, the first part of the article (down to and excluding September 7th) is pretty much ready. I'll add more info later as minor sources come, but the main thread of the story is there. Could you read it in your spare time?

The to-do list includes extending the detailed story all the way to September 8th, notably including the details of September 7th fights and some more info on what happened on other, less important fronts. I will also include more sources to corroborate what my main source says (not that there were that many monographs of this battle anyway). Probably I will also write a tad more on why the hell did Polish commanders want to surrender from the very start. In any way, I guess I'd like to push it the way Warsaw Uprising (1794) went - that is up towards FA. I guess in a couple of years it will be de-featured again, but what the heck.

Oh, and congrats on your "Kamienie na szaniec" :) //Halibu tt 10:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kosynierzy

On 23 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kosynierzy, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that kosynierzy, the war scythe wielding peasantry militia, became one of the symbols of the struggle for Polish independence? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kosynierzy. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Alex Shih ^Talk 00:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rising '44. The Battle for Warsaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macmillan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kościuszko

While reading Gardner's bio of Kościuszko (linked to in external links) I came across a few items that seem important enough that are missing in the article. I know the Kościuszko article is still undergoing an FA review but still feel these things ought to be added. What are your thoughts? -- Gwillhickers 16:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In my travels I came across two publications in the public domain that cover Kościuszko rather well that I thought you might find interesting. They're available for download in their entirety in PDF form: (Note: Don't click on the red 'EBOOK-FREE' box, instead hover over it and then click on 'Download PDF'.)

Memoir of Thaddeus Kosciuszko: Poland's hero and patriot, 1883

Somerset County Historical Quarterly, Volume 7, 1918

Enjoy. -- Gwillhickers 19:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Erving Goffman

The article Erving Goffman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Erving Goffman for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of DASonnenfeld -- DASonnenfeld (talk) 19:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

In the media: Chelsea Manning, Box-office predictors, and 'Storming Wikipedia'

Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective

WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks

Traffic report: Reddit creep

Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland

News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments

Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Battle of Warsaw (1831)

On 26 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Warsaw (1831), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Russian victory at the Battle of Warsaw in 1831 ended the Polish November Uprising? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Warsaw (1831). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Alex Shih ^Talk 12:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: Donghak Peasant Revolution

My own comments and yours have been written in the GA1 subpage. I have moved them to the main talk page. Please look at Talk:Donghak Peasant Revolution and revert if you dislike this move. Cheers. Pldx1 (talk) 16:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bóg, Honor, Ojczyzna

On 27 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bóg, Honor, Ojczyzna, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that one of the unofficial mottos of Poland, God, Honor and Fatherland, likely originated from the Napoleonic motto of the Legion of Honour order? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bóg, Honor, Ojczyzna. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Alex Shih ^Talk 00:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Józef Zajączek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Józef Zajączek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Sasata -- Sasata (talk) 01:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Mohamed Temam

The books you reference are just a listing of Algerian Artists. In fact the second book is just an updated 2011 version of the 2006 list. It seems someone decided to create articles on everyone who got listed in the book, which of course covers anyone who meets the Algerian Artist qualification. Caffeyw (talk) 08:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on my talk page vs. your comments on Battle of France

I have left almost exactly same reply on my own talk page, in response to the nice messages you left there, once I discovered your quite different commentary on the talk page of Battle of France. To wit...
I don't understand your apparent two-faced approach to communicating with me, Piotrus. While you are polite and enthusiastic in this comment here on my talk page, on the talk page of the Battle of France article your comments can be interpreted as hostile, dismissive and uncouth (ex. raging that you are "fed up" with my actions, when I have no idea who you are, and to the best of my recollection, have never interacted with you). Will this be your standard means of communicating with me in the future? Because if so, I'd prefer to have no contact with you whatsoever, as the lack of civility in your doublespeak is off-putting and the disrespect and hostility you manifest away from my talk page, after having left two nice, civil, respectful messages, creates an uncomfortable and schizophrenic virtual climate in which I do not feel safe interacting with you. Az x2 20:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LGBT in Japan

Yaoi has nothing to do with LGBT. Yaoi is culture of the heterosexuals. It is inappropriate to write in Template:LGBT in Japan. ヤオイ(Yaoi)は1970年代の日本で、異性愛女性に生み出されたものです。ja:森鴎外の娘のja:森茉莉が、書いたのが一番最初ですが。基本的にヤオイは異性愛者の文化です。ゲイ男性の多くはヤオイは読みません。

Yaoi was produced in Japan of the 1970s by a heterosexually oriented woman. It is Mori Mari first to have written. Yaoi is culture of the heterosexuals. Most of gay men do not read Yaoi. It has nothing to do with the culture of LGBT. Yaoi is a cltures of the heterosexuals, by the heterosexuals, for the heterosexuals. It isn't related topic. Yaio is an imaginary product of the hetero woman. It is different from the real homosexual. source:「オトコノコのためのボーイフレド」（1986,Japan）P72[1].--Leoxaq (talk) 03:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 97: / Line 97: @@
 I have left almost exactly same reply on my own talk page, in response to the nice messages you left there, once I discovered your quite different commentary on the talk page of [[Battle of France]]. To wit...<br />
 I don't understand your apparent two-faced approach to communicating with me, [[User:Piotrus|Piotrus]]. While you are polite and enthusiastic in [[User_talk:Azx2#Your_GA_nomination_of_Battle_of_France|this comment here]] on my talk page, on the talk page of the [[Battle of France]] article your comments can be interpreted as hostile, dismissive and uncouth (ex. raging that you are "fed up" with my actions, when I have no idea who you are, and to the best of my recollection, have never interacted with you). Will this be your standard means of communicating with me in the future? Because if so, I'd prefer to have no contact with you whatsoever, as the lack of civility in your doublespeak is off-putting and the disrespect and hostility you manifest away from my talk page, after having left two nice, civil, respectful messages, creates an uncomfortable and schizophrenic virtual climate in which I do not feel safe interacting with you. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px  #B8B8B8;">[[User:Azx2|<b style="color:#F50">Az</b>]][[User talk:Azx2|<b style="color:#600">x</b><b style="color:#000">2</b>]]</span>''' 20:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
+==Template:LGBT in Japan==
+Yaoi has nothing to do with LGBT. Yaoi is culture of the heterosexuals. It is inappropriate to write in [[Template:LGBT in Japan]].
+ヤオイ(Yaoi)は1970年代の日本で、異性愛女性に生み出されたものです。[[:ja:森鴎外]]の娘の[[:ja:森茉莉]]が、書いたのが一番最初ですが。基本的にヤオイは異性愛者の文化です。ゲイ男性の多くはヤオイは読みません。
+Yaoi was produced in Japan of the 1970s by a heterosexually oriented woman. It is [[Mori Mari]] first to have written. Yaoi is culture of the heterosexuals. Most of gay men do not read Yaoi. It has nothing to do with the culture of LGBT. Yaoi is a cltures of the heterosexuals, by the heterosexuals, for the heterosexuals. It isn't related topic. Yaio is an imaginary product of the hetero woman. It is different from the real homosexual. source:「オトコノコのためのボーイフレド」（1986,Japan）P72[http://honto.jp/netstore/pd-book_00457891.html].--[[User:Leoxaq|Leoxaq]] ([[User talk:Leoxaq|talk]]) 03:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)