Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dabomb87 (talk | contribs) at 14:45, 7 June 2011 (→‎User:Iha9c: not done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Autopatrolled (add request)

Shortcuts

User:Vensatry

I have made 4000 plus edits and created nearly 60 plus articles with some of them being well referenced and also contributed to two GA. Thalapathi (Ping Back) 09:13, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kittybrewster

Automated (bot) request. User has created 509 articles. NoomBot 19:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
{{nd}} long, but old, block log - would prefer a human nomination for this or the user requesting peronally. Skier Dude (talk) 16:58, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Human nomination requested (unsure why anyone would personally request autopatrolled for themselves; it gives no benefit to the person who receives it) so here goes: I've seen this user's articles at Special:NewPages and every article I've seen is well-referenced and on clearly notable subjects. All blocks seem in the distant past and none seem related to article creation. And just had a look through the recent newly created articles and they are all fine contributions that should not have to be patrolled. I would request that another admin (or Skier Dude again, if he is so inclined) to have a more in-depth review of this candidate. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from archive. Have nowikied the nd template so, hopefully, the bot doesn't archive it again. Jenks24 (talk) 15:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dougweller notified. Let's wait for a comment from him first. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but for the life of me I can't figure out why I was notified, have I been confused with Kittybrewster? Dougweller (talk) 05:02, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You removed Kittybrewster's autopatrolled rights back in February. I was hoping you could shed some light on that right removal. -FASTILY (TALK) 05:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, thought it might have been the block log. I'll have to check the ANI archives. Dougweller (talk) 05:44, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See [1] where he explicitly asked for this. There seems to have been concerns about COI and copyvio. As Kittybrewster wrote "I agree that I should lose autopatrolled status." I don't think we should restore permission on the basis of a bot. Dougweller (talk) 05:58, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the ANI thread.[2] Given that there were serious reasons for the removal of autopatroller, I don't see why this should proceed without a request by Kittybrewster himself.   Will Beback  talk  05:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And  Not done per above. If Kittybrewster wants his autopatrolled right returned, he should request it himself. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I didn't know about the ANI issues that had lead to the loss of autopatrolled and that Kittybrewster had requested the removal himself. Thanks to everyone who took the time to comment on this. Jenks24 (talk) 09:17, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:HXL49

I have never created an unreferenced BLP, or biography for that matter, and have enough experience on here to know better regarding sourcing, etc. Also, when I create redirects or DAB pages in Chinese, I wish to avoid hounding that could lead to PRODs, RFDs, AFDs, and the like, much less anything that leads to a massive debate like this one here (Proposal for non-Roman...). —HXL's Roundtable and Record 23:30, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You want this right to so as to avoid scrutiny? This is most definitely not what this right is to be used for. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:43, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Move your lazy ass aside and start reading my comments. I stated in my rationale that any time I create a Chinese disambiguation page I always run the risk that some watchful eyes, unaware of the overwhelming merits of the pro-proposal arguments in the discussion I linked above, will nominate it for PROD, AFD, and sometimes (as with the case of Andyjsmith) nominate re-directs for deletion. The scrutiny that I wish to completely avoid is related only to what I do in a foreign language. Don't you DARE wilfully misconstrue my words. Besides that point, the notion that I can "avoid scrutiny" for all my other work is unfounded. If I neglected to add a category, do you really think Bearcat will not eventually notice? If I write an unreferenced article, do you really think {{unreferenced}} tags will not be eventually added? This is nothing but idiocy on your part.
In light of my seething explanation above, whether I deserve this privilege is completely dependant on my demonstrated understanding of WP:V and WP:RS. You are free to check for yourself the non-DAB articles that I have created. You will see that, with only a few exceptions, all of them are sourced. I intend to use this right is in preparation for creating articles on towns, townships, and subdistricts...There will be many of them, and I intend very much to be the Chinese equivalent of Dr. Blofeld, only with higher quality articles in the majority of situations. —HXL's Roundtable and Record 05:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You just attacked 2 established editors, the last albeit indirectly, and were incredibly uncivil. As this is not the first time you have been remarkably rude, should you continue I will take this to WP:WQA. Unsourced articles are a problem, NPP-ers already have enough of a workload as it is, having someone create the occasional unsourced article is not going to alleviate their workload at all, nay add. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 7:12pm • 09:12, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, at some point this summer I will begin those town, township, and subdistrict articles en masse. Taking each of those creations off the NPP log when they occur is how I intend to utilise this privilege. —HXL's Roundtable and Record 13:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I believe your going to find yourself at self inflicted WP:Snowball. Good luck. Mlpearc powwow 13:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why would that be? Once I make another request, it would be ill practise for Fastily, who evidently hasn't bothered to read any of what I read, to decide on it, even if he decides to grant it to me. —HXL's Roundtable and Record 14:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No one's stopping you, until you do create those articles and they are well-referenced/written admins can't just take your word for it. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 5:20pm • 07:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But I have written plenty of them already. —HXL's Roundtable and Record 12:41, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chris the speller

More than 700 articles. Marcus Qwertyus 18:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 21:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Neddyseagoon

Automated (bot) request. User has created 5649 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 22:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Right was revoked less than a month ago due to creation of problematic articles. -FASTILY (TALK) 22:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:PANONIAN

Automated (bot) request. User has created 815 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 22:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 23:14, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:HenryLi

Automated (bot) request. User has created 754 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 22:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done User has made <10 edits in the last 6 months. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:14, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alperen

Automated (bot) request. User has created 441 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 22:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done User has made <30 edits in the last 7 months or so and created no new articles. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:15, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Backspace

Automated (bot) request. User has created 411 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 22:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 23:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Reinyday

Automated (bot) request. User has created 405 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 22:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done User has numerous AfD and PROD warnings on their talk page. An article the user created 4 days ago was just speedied under A7. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Markh

Automated (bot) request. User has created 392 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 22:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done User has made ~10 edits in the last year and a half. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Princeofpersia1

Automated (bot) request. User has created 389 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 22:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done User's autopatrolled rights were revoked a little over a year ago for creation of unreferenced BLPs. If User:Princeofpersia1 wants the flag returned, they need to personally request that the flag be returned. -FASTILY (TALK) 23:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vinie007

Automated (bot) request. User has created 382 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 00:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done User's talkpage contains numerous recent AfD and PROD warnings. User was also recently blocked for uploading media files with unknown copyright status. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:22, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alexk785

Automated (bot) request. User has created 375 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 00:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:NapHit

Automated (bot) request. User has created 369 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 00:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Untifler

Automated (bot) request. User has created 354 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 00:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done User has made ~50 edits and created no new articles in the past 6 months. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rfc1394

Automated (bot) request. User has created 344 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 00:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done User has edited sporadically for the past few months. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Roslagen

Automated (bot) request. User has created 323 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 00:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kks862003

Automated (bot) request. User has created 319 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 00:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Petri Krohn

Automated (bot) request. User has created 317 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 00:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iha9c

Automated (bot) request. User has created 312 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 01:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Some of their recent creations have been problematic, such as this unreferenced BLP. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jimmyscy

Automated (bot) request. User has created 306 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 01:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Azumanga1

Automated (bot) request. User has created 296 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 01:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dyanega

Automated (bot) request. User has created 292 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 01:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Opark 77

Automated (bot) request. User has created 291 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 01:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Barbara Osgood

Automated (bot) request. User has created 276 articles. User doesn't want flag? Add them to the Opt-out page. NoomBot 01:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Autopatrolled&oldid=433040582"