Battle of Verneuil
|Battle of Verneuil|
|Part of the Hundred Years' War|
Battle of Verneuil
| Kingdom of England
Duchy of Burgundy
| Kingdom of France
Kingdom of Scotland
|Commanders and leaders|
| John, Duke of Bedford
Earl of Salisbury
| Viscount Aumale †
John Stewart, 2nd Earl of Buchan †
Archibald Douglas, 4th Earl of Douglas †
|Casualties and losses|
|1600||6000 - 10,000|
The Battle of Verneuil (occasionally 'Vernuil') was a strategically important battle of the Hundred Years' War, fought on 17 August 1424 near Verneuil in Normandy and a significant English victory. It was a particularly bloody battle, described by the English as a second Agincourt. Altogether some 7262 French and allied troops were killed, including 4000 Scots. English losses were 1600, including two men-at-arms and "a very few archers". The Scots army, led by Archibald, Earl of Douglas and John Stewart, Earl of Buchan (both of whom were killed), was almost destroyed. Many French noblemen were taken prisoner; among them the Duke of Alençon, Pierre, the bastard of Alençon, and Marshall Lafayette. After Verneuil, the English were able to consolidate their position in Normandy. The Army of Scotland as a distinct unit ceased to play a significant part in the Hundred Years' War, although many Scots continued to serve in France.
The black time
France had scarcely recovered from the disaster at Agincourt, and most of the northern provinces were in the hands of the English following Henry V's conquest of Normandy. The civil war between the factions of Armagnac and Burgundy showed no sign of ending. The Dauphin was recognised in the south of the country as Charles VII, following the death of his father Charles VI in 1422, but he remained uncrowned. The death of Henry V in the same year as Charles VI brought little relief as the continuing English war effort was effectively managed by John, Duke of Bedford, acting for the infant Henry VI. France desperately needed soldiers, and looked to Scotland, her old ally, to provide essential military aid.
The Army of Scotland
The first large contingent of Scots troops came to France in the autumn of 1419, some 6000 men under the command of John Stewart, 2nd Earl of Buchan. These men, supplemented from time-to-time with fresh volunteers, soon became an integral part of the French war effort; and by the summer of 1420 the 'Army of Scotland' was a distinct force in the French royal service. They proved their worth the following year, playing a large part in the victory at the Battle of Baugé, the first serious setback experienced by the English. The mood of optimism this engendered collapsed in 1423, when many of Buchan's men fell at the Battle of Cravant.
At the beginning of 1424 Buchan returned, bringing with him a further 6500 men. He was accompanied by Archibald Douglas, 4th Earl of Douglas, arguably the most powerful nobleman of Scotland. On 24 April 1424 the army, comprising 2500 men at arms and 4000 archers, entered Bourges, the Dauphin's headquarters, helping to raise Charles' spirits.
March to Verneuil
In August the new army made ready to march into action to relieve the castle of Ivry near Le Mans, under siege by the Duke of Bedford. Douglas (the newly created Duke of Touraine), and Buchan left Tours on 4 August to link with the French commanders, the Duke of Alençon and the Viscounts of Narbonne and Aumale. But before the army could arrive Ivry surrendered to the English. Uncertain what to do the allied commanders held a council of war. The Scots and some of the younger French officers were eager for battle; but Narbonne and the senior nobility had not forgotten Agincourt, and were reluctant to take the risk. As a compromise it was agreed to attack the English strongholds on the Norman border, beginning with Verneuil in the west. The town was taken by a simple trick: a group of Scots, leading some of their fellow countrymen as prisoners, pretended to be English, and claimed that Bedford had defeated the allies in battle, whereupon the gates were opened.
On 15 August 1424 Bedford received news that Verneuil was in French hands and resolved to make his way there as quickly as he could. As he neared the town two days later the Scots persuaded their French comrades to make a stand, Douglas apparently having forgotten the lessons of Homildon Hill. He is said to have received a message from Bedford that he had come to drink with him and prayed for an early meeting. Douglas replied that having failed to find the duke in England he had come to seek him in France.
The Allied Franco-Scottish army deployed a mile north of Verneuil on an open plain astride the road leading out of the Forest of Piseux. Narbonne and the French division was situated on the left of the road, supported by wings of Milanese cavalry, while Douglas and Buchan were on the right supported by a similar wing of Lombard cavalry, recruited in northern Italy. Aumale was given overall command; but this heterogeneous army defied all attempts at co-ordinated direction. On emerging from the Forest Bedford drew up his men in two divisions to match the disposition of the enemy, with the usual distribution of men-at-arms in the centre and archers on the wings. He also took the precaution of posting a strong reserve of 2000 archers to the rear to guard the baggage, tying the horses together to prevent flight. Bedford commanded the division facing the French, and Sir Thomas Montacute, Earl of Salisbury, that facing the Scots.
A bloody day
At about 4pm, as if by some pre-arranged signal, the Milanese charged through the English archers. Once Bedford had taken his troops within arrow range he ordered a halt and the archers started to drive their stakes into the ground, a simple but effective device for snaring cavalry. The ground had been baked hard by the summer sun, and the stakes could be forced in only with difficulty. Seeing an opportunity the French began an immediate charge out of synchronisation with the Scots division. The archers on Bedford's extreme right were caught off balance, allowing the French cavalry to break through their ranks (improved, tempered steel armour worn by the Lombards may also have contributed to the effect). They continued their charge away towards the baggage train to the north, while the men-at-arms in Bedford's division began a spirited attack on the French infantry to their front. Unable to withstand the onslaught, Narbonne's division broke and was chased back to Verneuil, where many, including Aumale, were drowned in the moat. Narbonne, Ventadour, Tonnerre were all dead.
Having disposed of the French, Bedford called a halt to the pursuit and returned to the battlefield, where Salisbury was closely engaged with the Scots, now standing alone. The Lombard cavalry, anxious that their French counterparts were poised to take all the spoils, charged round the English left flank towards the baggage. By the time they arrived the French had been driven off by Bedford's reserve, soon to be followed by the Lombards. Having tasted blood the reserve decided on their own initiative to enter the main battle, charging on the unsupported Scottish right wing. The Battle of Verneuil reached its closing stages when Bedford wheeled from the south to take the Scots on the right flank. Now almost completely surrounded, the Scots made a ferocious last stand. The English shouted "A Clarence! A Clarence!" invoking Thomas, Duke of Clarence killed at the Battle of Baugé.
A high price
Verneuil was one of the bloodiest battles of the Hundred Years' War, described by the English as a second Agincourt. Altogether some 7262 allied troops were killed, including 4000 Scots. The English lost 1600 men including two men-at-arms, and "a very few archers" according to Bedford. Archibald, Earl of Douglas fought on the losing side for the last time, joined in death by the Earl of Buchan. The Army of Scotland had been severely mauled; but it was not yet ready to march out of history. It did have the effect though, of greatly reducing any reinforcements from Scotland for future campaigns against the English in France. Amongst the prisoners were the Duke of Alençon, Pierre, the bastard of Alençon, and Marshall Lafayette. Greatly saddened by the catastrophe at Verneuil, Charles VII continued to honour the survivors, one of whom, John Carmichael of Douglasdale, the chaplain of the dead Douglas, was created Bishop of Orléans. Bedford returned in triumph to Paris: "he was received as if he had been God...in short, more honour was never done at a Roman triumph than was done that day to him and his wife".
The consequences of the victory at Verneuil were: The English captured all border posts of Lancastrian Normandy and La Hire withdrew to the east. The only exception was Mont Saint-Michel, where the monks resisted. A plan to take Rouen by mining was foiled due to Bedford's victory.
Literature and legacy
The French chronicles made long details of the reactions of the people of Paris under Burgundian rule. The Bourgeois of Paris and Enguerrand Monstrelet are major sources for this battle. In 1858, Jean Chartier's chronicle of Charles VII corroborated the story of a complete English victory. The French writers bemoaned the loss of life to King Charles' cause. Newhall's study of warfare in 1924 remains a reliable authority on the battle tactics and events. The Victorian Rev. Stevenson translated a French study into the noble families which suffered so much in the Hundred Years' War, and is oft quoted. And similarly Simeon Luce also writing in 19th century was transcribing from what remained of original documents in the National Library. These secondary sources are all that are available as many of the original contemporary accounts were lost in translations. The English had the advantage later of Burgundian Jehan Waurin travelling with the army, but he had little to say on Verneuil. Alfred Burne's military estimates were near accurate; his theory of Inherent Military Probability is making a comeback. Ultra modern accounts in the two volumes of Jonathan Sumption are complemented by an analysis of archery in Strickland and Hardy.
- Newhall, English Conquest, pp. 315-17
- Barker, 80.; Burne, 369 ;Newhall, 319-20.; the numbers of English casualties are not in the chronicles as being high at all; there is no evidence perhaps because the victors on the field collated the French dead, and took prisoners.
- Juliet Barker, "Conquest: The English kingdom in France", 79
- Burne, 368-9
- "un merveilleux cry", Jehan Waurin
- Barker, 79-80.
- Barker, 80.; Burne, 369 ;Newhall, 319-20.; the numbers of english casualties are not in the chronicles as being high at all; there is no evidence perhaps because the victors on the field collated the french dead, and took prisoners.
- Barker, 81; J Shirley(ed.), A Parisian journal, 1405-1449 (1968), 200-1.
- The Brut Continuation H
- Liber Pluscardine
- Harleian MS 50 (BL)
- Burne, A. H., The Agincourt War. A Military History of the Latter Part of the Hundred Years War from 1369 to 1453, (1956), Folio soc., 2005, 358-69.
- Brown, M, 'French alliance or English peace? Scotland and the last phase of the Hundred Years' War, 1415-53' in L.Clark (ed.), Conflicts, Consequences and the Crown in the Late Middle Ages (Woodbridge, 2007), 81-99.
- Casavetti, E., The Lion and the Lilies, 1977.
- Donaldson, G., The Auld Alliance, 1985.
- Forbes-Leith, W., The Scots Men-at-Arms and Life Guards in France, 1882.
- Griffiths, R. A., The Reign of Henry VI, 1981.
- Newhall, R.A. The English Conquest of Normandy 1416-1434: a study in fifteenth century warfare New Haven and London, 1924.
- Seward, D. The Hundred Years War, 1978.
- Simpson, M. A, "The Campaign of Verneuil", in the English Historical Review, vol. 49, 1934.
- Stuart, M. W., The Scot who was a Frenchman, 1940.