Cant (road/rail)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Cant in a velodrome

The cant of a railway track (also referred to as superelevation) or a road (sometimes referred to as cross slope or camber) is the difference in elevation (height) between the two edges. This is normally done where the railway or road is curved; raising the outer rail or the outer edge of the road providing a banked turn, thus allowing vehicles to maneuver through the curve at higher speeds than would otherwise be possible if the surface was flat or level.

Rail[edit]

Further information: Rail tracks
The cant in a curve of the Nuremberg–Ingolstadt line
Track lubrication on a reverse curve in an area prone to movement due to wet beds

On railways, cant helps a train steer around a curve, keeping the wheel flanges from touching the rails, minimising friction and wear.

The main functions of cant are to:

  • Better distribute load across both rails
  • Reduce rail- and wheel-wear
  • Neutralise the effect of lateral forces
  • Improve passenger comfort
Railway superelevation at work.

The necessary cant in a curve depends on the expected speed of the trains and the radius. However, it may be necessary to select a compromise value at design time, for example if slow-moving trains may occasionally use tracks intended for high-speed trains.

Generally the aim is for trains to run without flange contact, which also depends on the tyre profile of the wheels. Allowance has to be made for the different speeds of trains. Slower trains will tend to make flange contact with the inner rail on curves, while faster trains will tend to ride outwards and make contact with the outer rail. Either contact causes wear and tear and may lead to derailment. Many high-speed lines do not permit slower freight trains, particularly with heavier axle loads. In some cases, the impact is reduced by the use of flanges lubrication.

Ideally, the track should have sleepers (railroad ties) at a closer spacing and a greater depth of ballast to accommodate the increased forces exerted in the curve.

At the ends of a curve, the amount of cant cannot change from zero to its maximum immediately. It must change (ramp) gradually in a track transition curve. The length of the transition depends on the maximum allowable speed—the higher the speed, the greater length is required.

In the United States, maximum speed is subject to specific rules. The maximum speed of a train on curved track for a given cant deficiency or unbalanced superelevation is determined by the following formula:[1]

V_{max}=\sqrt{\frac{E_a + E_u}{0.0007d}}

where E_a is the height in inches that the outside rail is "superelevated" above the inside rail on a curve, E_u is the unbalanced superelevation or cant deficiency in inches and d is the degree of curvature in degrees per 30 m V_{max} is in mph.

For the United States standard maximum unbalanced superelevation of 75 mm (3 in), the formula is:

V_{max}=\sqrt{\frac{E_a + 3}{0.0007d}}

The maximum value of cant (the height of the outer rail above the inner rail) for a standard gauge railway is about 150 mm (6 in).[citation needed] For high-speed railways in Europe, maximum cant is 180 mm (7 in) (when slow freight trains are not allowed).[2]

Track unbalanced superelevation (cant deficiency) in the United States is restricted to 75 mm (3 in), though 102 mm (4.0 in) is permissible by waiver. The maximum value for European railways vary by country, some of which have curves with over 280 mm (11 in) of unbalanced superelevation to permit high-speed transportation. The highest values are only for tilting trains, because it would be too uncomfortable for passengers.[3]

Examples[edit]

In Australia, ARTC is increasing speed around curves sharper than an 800-metre (2,625 ft) radius by replacing wooden sleepers with concrete ones so that the cant can be increased.[4]

Rail cant[edit]

The rails themselves are now usually canted inwards by about 10 to 5 per cent.

In 1925 about 15 of 36 major railways had adopted this practice.[5]

Roads[edit]

In civil engineering, cant is often referred to as cross slope or camber. It helps rainwater drain from the road surface. Along straight or gently curved sections, the middle of the road is normally higher than the edges. This is called "normal crown" and helps shed rainwater off the sides of the road. During road works that involve lengths of temporary carriageway, the slope may be the opposite to normal – i.e. with the outer edge higher – which causes vehicles to lean towards oncoming traffic: in the UK this is indicated on warning signs as 'adverse camber'.

On more severe bends, the outside edge of the curve is raised, or superelevated, to help vehicles around the curve. The amount of superelevation increases with its design speed and with curve sharpness.

Off-camber[edit]

An off-camber corner is described as the opposite of a banked turn, or a negative-bank turn, which is lower on the outside of a turn than on the inside.[6][7] Off-camber corners are both feared and celebrated by skilled drivers.[8][9] Handling them is a major factor in skilled vehicle control, both single-track and automotive; both engine-powered and human-powered vehicles; both on and off closed courses; and both on and off paved surfaces.

On race courses, they are one of a handful of engineering factors a course designer has at his disposal to challenge and test drivers' skills,[10] described by a training guide for prospective racers as "the hardest corners you will encounter" on the track.[11] Many notable courses such as Riverside International Raceway combine off-camber corners with elevation and link corners for extra driver challenge.[12]

On the street, they are a feature of some of the world's most celebrated paved roads, such as "The Dragon" (US 129) through Deals Gap[13] and "The Diamondback" (NC 226A) in North Carolina,[14] Route 78 in Ohio,[15] Route 125 in Pennsylvania,[16] Route 33 in California,[17] and Betws-y-Coed Triangle at Snowdonia National Park in Wales.[18]

To mountain bikers and motorcyclists on trails and dirt tracks, off-camber corners are also challenging, and can be either an engineered course feature, or a natural feature of single-track trails.[19][20][21][22]

Camber in virtual race circuits is carefully controlled by video game race simulators to achieve the designer's desired level of difficulty.[10]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Marquis, Brian. "Cant Deficiency, Curve Speeds and Tilt". Retrieved 2011-10-14. 
  2. ^ 2002/732/EC. *, Commission Decision of 30 May 2002 concerning the Technical Specification for Interoperability
  3. ^ Zierke, Hans-Joachim. "Comparison of upgrades needs to recognize the difference in curve speeds". Retrieved 2008-04-10. 
  4. ^ "North South – strategy for growth Craven AU$421.6 million Investment for Sydney Brisbane Corridor". Links (Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd.) (11). August 2005. Retrieved 22 November 2012. Concrete re-sleepering of all curves of less than an 810-metre radius, using some 220,000 sleepers to increase cant deficiency and super-elevation, will be undertaken allowing for increased train speeds and further reducing transit times. 
  5. ^ ""KNOCK-KNEED" RAILS.". The Queenslander (Brisbane, Qld. : 1866 - 1939) (Brisbane, Qld.: National Library of Australia). 7 February 1925. p. 9. Retrieved 20 November 2011. 
  6. ^ Radlauer, Ed (1973), Motorcyclopedia, Bowmar, p. 46, ISBN 9780837208855, Off camber turn: An off camber turn is the opposite of a banked turn. It's lower on the outside of a turn than on the inside. 
  7. ^ Bentley, Ross (1998). Speed Secrets. Motorbooks. p. 78. ISBN 0760305188. 
  8. ^ Mike Spinelli (July 26, 2013), "The fastest corners at Mosport are off-camber, downhill and blind", /Drive 
  9. ^ Frank Strouse, "State Route 112 - Washington", Motorcycleroads.us (Screaming Eagle Web Solutions), Tight turns and some off-camber curves make this road a delight. 
  10. ^ a b Luke McMillan (September 6, 2011), "A Rational Approach To Racing Game Track Design", Gamasutra 
  11. ^ Kenton Koch (2013), "Kenton Koch on Driving Technical Corners", Mazdaspeed Motorsports Development (Mazda North American Operations), Off camber corners: These corners are the hardest corners you will encounter... 
  12. ^ Van Valkenberg, Paul (October 1983), "What's It Really Like Out There?", Road & Track 35: 67–69, Riverside International Raceway is a good example of a course with no isolated textbook turns: Every corner is either combined with another, or banked, off-camber, rising or falling. 
  13. ^ Darryl Cannon (September 25, 2012), "Deals Gap Revealed—Tail of the Dragon", Super Streetbike (Bonnier Group), [One of] the two worst corners [is] "Guardrail cliff," a sharp off-camber left ... 
  14. ^ Scot J. Marburger (2011), Top motorcycling roads: the Deep South, Gunsmoke Engineering 
  15. ^ Greg Harrison (July 2001), "Riding Roller-Coaster Roads on History's Trail", American Motorcyclist (American Motorcyclist Association): 31–32, [It] offers all types of curves—off-camber tight stuff, sweepers and esses that make me scramble from one side of the bike to the other while my foot stabs for the right gear. 
  16. ^ Robert H. Miller (1997) (2010). "PA125 - A Reptilian Tour on PA's Best Road". In Backroad Bob, Robert H. Miller. Motorcycle Road Trips (Vol. 14) Roads & Road Houses – Tour de Gastronomy. p. 4. ISBN 9781452460512. Changing elevation a thousand feet at a time as it snakes over six mountain passes it offers no rest from decreasing radius, off-camber, blind and switchback curves. 
  17. ^ John Pearley Huffman (June 28, 2013), "The 10 Best Fourth of July Road Trips: Great Places and the Great Roads To Get You There", Edmunds.com, Route 33 has everything. It rolls across the Santa Ynez Mountains and plunges into the Cuyama Valley in relentlessly interesting ways. That includes midcorner elevation changes, off-camber hairpins, tightening-radius sweepers and straights long enough to hit terminal velocity. It's 72 miles of pure entertainment. 
  18. ^ The World's Best Motorcycle Routes, MCE Insurance 
  19. ^ "Riding Off-Camber Corners Over A Rise With Andrew Short – Pro Secrets – Dirt Rider Magazine", Dirt Rider, July 21, 2009 
  20. ^ Advanced Off Camber, MTB Techniques 
  21. ^ Steve Geall, Robin Kitchin, Greg Minaar (2001). The Ultimate Guide to Mountain Biking. Globe Pequot. p. 57. ISBN 9781585743032. 
  22. ^ Andrew Trevitt (October 3, 2011), "Riding skills series: Camber and Elevation—Using Both to Your Advantage", Sport Rider 

Further reading[edit]