Nutrition transition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Nutrition transition is the shift in dietary consumption and energy expenditure that coincides with economic, demographic, and epidemiological changes. Specifically the term is used for the recent transition of developing countries from traditional diets high in cereal and fiber to more Western pattern diets high in sugars, fat, and animal-source food.

Historical framework[edit]

The nutrition transition model was first proposed in 1993 by Barry Popkin, and is the most cited framework in literature regarding the nutrition transition,[1] although it has been subject to some criticism for being overly simplified.[2][3] Popkin posits that two other historic transitions affect and are affected by nutritional transition. The first is the demographic transition, whereby a pattern of high fertility and high mortality transforms to one of low fertility and low mortality. Secondly, an epidemiological transition occurs, wherein a shift from a pattern of high prevalence of infectious diseases associated with malnutrition, and with periodic famine and poor environmental sanitation, to a pattern of high prevalence of chronic and degenerative diseases associated with urban-industrial lifestyles is shown. These concurrent and dynamically influenced transitions share an emphasis on the ways in which populations move from one pattern to the next. Popkin used five broad patterns to help summarize the nutrition transition model.[1] While these patterns largely appear chronological, it is important to note that they are not restricted to certain periods of human history and still characterize certain geographic and socioeconomic subpopulations. The first pattern is that of collecting food, a characterization of hunter-gatherers, whose diets were high in carbohydrates and low in fat, especially unsaturated fat. The second pattern is defined by famine, a marked scarcity and reduced variation of the food supply. The third pattern is one of receding famine. Fruits, vegetables, and animal protein consumption increases, and starchy staples become less important in the diet. The fourth pattern is one of degenerative diseases onset by a diet high in total fat, cholesterol, sugar, and other refined carbohydrates and low in polyunsaturated fatty acids and fiber. This pattern is often accompanied by an increasingly sedentary lifestyle. The fifth pattern, and most recently emerging pattern, is characterized by a behavioral change reflective of a desire to prevent or delay degenerative diseases. Recent and rapid changes seen in developing countries from the second and third pattern to the fourth is the common focus of nutrition transition research and desire for policy that would emphasize a healthier overall diet characterizes the shift from the fourth to the fifth pattern.

Relation to economic development[edit]

The nutrition transition has much of its roots in economic factors related to the development of a nation or subpopulations within a nation. It was once believed that current nutrition transition was endemic only to industrialized nations like the United States, but increasing research has indicated that not only is nutrition transition occurring most rapidly in low- and middle-income developing countries, the stress of its effects stands to burden the poorest populations of these countries the most as well.[4][5][6][7][8] This shift is attributable to many causes. Globalization has played a large role in altering the access and availability of foods in formerly undeveloped nations. Demographic shifts from rural to urban areas are central to this as well as the liberalization of food markets, global food marketing, and the emergence of transnational food companies in developing countries.[2][9][10] All these forces of globalization are creating lifestyle changes that contribute to the nutrition transition. Technological advancements are making previously arduous labor less difficult and thus altering energy expenditure that would have helped offset the caloric increases in the diet.[5] Daily tasks and leisure are also affected by technological advancements and contributing to greater rates of inactivity. The aforementioned increases in calorie are due to increased consumption of edible oils, animal-source foods, caloric sweeteners, accompanied by reduced consumption of grains and fruits and vegetables.[4][6][11][12][13] These changes play into human biological preferences seen across the world.[14] Socioeconomic factors also play an important role as do cultural values tied to appearance and status.

Globalization and economic factors[edit]

The current nutrition transition seen in the emerging markets of Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, North Africa, and urban areas of sub-Saharan Africa is largely a product of globalization. International food trade, investment, commercialization and marketing are drastically impacting the availability of and access to energy-dense, but nutrient-deficient foods causing the aforementioned shift from traditional diet.[10] Another byproduct of globalization has been a marked demographic transition in these countries from rural areas to urban ones. Urban populations are more susceptible to current trends in nutrition transition because of the improved transportation, commercial food distribution and marketing, less labor intensive-occupations, and changes in household eating habits and structure.[1] The liberalization of food markets has had a drastic effect on consumption patterns across the globe. Liberalization and commercialization of domestic agricultural markets are opening up food trading since this is needed to compete in the world market.[15] This had led to changes in the types of food produced, and increases in amounts of food imported into developing countries, which affects the relative availability and prices of different foods. Food demand is being shaped by increases in income and urbanization. As these rapidly developing nations continue to accrue high incomes per capita, their food spending is increasing as well. They elect to use these higher incomes on more calorically-dense foods that are sweeter and higher in fats.[6] For example, in China, for the same extra dollar of income, an average Chinese person is purchasing higher calorie food today than that person would have done for the same extra yuan in 1990.[16] Rapid urbanization has also shaped food demand globally. The demographic transition from rural areas to urban populations is a well documented byproduct of globalization and technological advancements. This is because agro-food systems have replaced local subsistence farming in many rural areas.[17] The supply of food is directly sculpted by increasing demand in these areas with growing income. Urbanization is increasing access to new foods and therefore altering the supply chain. This is why transnational food companies have grown so rapidly over the past few decades. These companies are making processed and fast foods much cheaper and more widely available through the growth of transnational supermarkets and chain restaurants. Food is not only easier to obtain in urban areas; it is also cheaper and less time-consuming to acquire which creates an imbalance between energy intake and output.[18] Their advertising and promotional strategies have a strong affect on consumer choices and desire. Foreign direct investment is also stimulating processed food sales in these supermarkets by lowering prices and creating incentives for advertising and promotion. A large proportion of this advertising is for energy-dense processed foods and is being directed at children and youth.[10] Technological and transportation advancements are reducing the barriers that once limited global food trade. These techniques are critical to facilitating the production and distribution needed in a global market. Better preservation techniques are helping to reduce waste which contributes to lower prices for consumers. Technology is creating higher yields which also reduce prices.[2]

Lifestyle changes[edit]

The forces of globalization are strongly influencing many lifestyle changes in developing countries. Major changes in economic structures from agrarian economies to industrialized economies are reducing physical activity levels in occupations around the world.[11] Even in agricultural work, gas-powered technologies are helping reduce the energy expenditure needed to perform pertinent farming tasks. These reduced activity levels are not just seen in the workplace, but in homes as well. Daily tasks that were once laborious engagements are now much easier with the help of technological advancements, with examples being appliances such as washing machines, refrigerators, and stoves. Also, recent leaps in the efficiency of food production (canning, refrigeration, freezing, and packaging being a few of the most notable) and improvements in cookware, such as the introduction of improved metal stoves which use fossil fuels and microwave ovens, have helped reduce domestic efforts greatly. [11]

Leisure is being greatly impacted as well. Activities such as playing sports outside are being replaced with television watching and computer games.[6] Decreasing physical leisure activities can also be contributed to urbanization wherein access to fields needed to play such games as soccer are not available due to such dense populations and their subsequent demand for land.[17] Other important lifestyle changes fueling the nutrition transition relate to the composition of diets. These dietary shifts have been mentioned previously several times but deserve greater scrutiny. Diets rich in legumes, other vegetables, and coarse grains are disappearing in all regions and countries. Taking their place are diets characterized by fat-rich edible and vegetable oils, cheap animal-source foods high in fat and protein, and artificially sweetened foods high in sugar and refined carbohydrates. Consumption of caloric beverages such as soda represented 21% of all calorie intake in Mexico from 1996 to 2002.[6][13] Processes of globalization that have influenced food markets have made these products much cheaper, flavorful, and easier to produce which has in turn driven up their demand. So while globalization and the accompanying economic development has created higher levels of food security for developing countries, the ongoing trend of eating in a more Western fashion has caused increased rates of adverse health and childhood obesity. [19]

Biopsychosocial forces[edit]

The desires for these new diets and lifestyles are very understandable from a biological and psychosocial perspective. For example, humans have an innate preference for sweets dating back to hunter-gatherer populations. These sweets signaled a good source of energy for hunter-gatherers that were not food secure. This same concept also relates to human predisposition for energy-dense fatty foods. These foods were needed to sustain long journeys and provided a safety net for times of famine. Humans also desire to eliminate physical exertion. This can explain the shift to more sedentary lifestyles from occupational, domestic, and leisurely activities that were previously much more physical taxing.[13] Socioeconomic and cultural influences also contribute to lifestyle changes associated with nutrition transition. The transfer of tastes by means of tourism and open food trade has introduced developing nations to foods previously enjoyed only by industrialized countries. Global food advertising and promotion has only further cemented these dietary changes.[10] Additionally some cultures view obese body types in high regard as they relate them to power, beauty and affluence.[7] Several studies suggest that socioeconomic status contributes greatly to nutrition transition wherein there is a lack of healthy food alternatives completely or a lack of affordable healthy food alternatives.[15][20][21]

Health and economic outcomes[edit]

While increased food security is a major benefit of global nutrition transition, there are a myriad of coinciding negative health and economic consequences. Rates of obesity are soaring across the world and recent trends suggest that incidences of overnutrition in coming decades will overtake that of undernutrition in the developing world. As well there will be a marked epidemiological shift from infectious disease to degenerative, noncommunicable disease, NCDs in these countries.[4] As it stands now these countries face a unique paradox in having to deal with both over- and undernutrition, a dual burden of malnutrition, that will inevitably be accompanied by both infectious and noncommunicable diseases, a dual burden of disease.[22][23][24][25] The economic impact will be enormous as well. In addition to reduced productivity, the health systems of these countries stand to face a tremendous burden.[26]

Health outcomes[edit]

The foremost health outcome of the global nutrition transition will be an increased prevalence of obesity across the world. Obesity prevalence in developing countries increased from 2.3% in 1988 to 19.6% in 1998.[27] Incidences are highest among women and children, indicating health inequities across global populations.[28] Obesity is strongly linked to degenerative, NCDs such as coronary heart disease, diabetes, stroke, and hypertension. WHO estimates place NCDs as the principal global cause of morbidity and mortality,[29] and global prevalence of chronic diseases is projected to increase substantially over the next 2 decades in developing countries.[28] Between 1990 and 2020, mortality from cardiovascular diseases, CVDs, in developing countries is expected to increase 120% for women and 137% for men compared to 29 and 49% respectively in industrialized countries.[28] In many of the countries facing epidemics of overnutrition, there is still widespread undernutrition.

Dual burden of disease[edit]

Deemed as a developmental challenge of epidemic proportions,[30] the double burden of disease (DBD) is an emerging global health challenge, that exists predominately in low-to-middle income countries. More specifically, the DBD refers to the dual burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases(NCD).[31] Today, over 90 per cent of the world’s disease burden occurs in developing regions, and most are attributed to communicable diseases. Communicable diseases are infectious diseases that “can be passed between people through proximity, social contact or intimate contact.”[32] Common diseases in this category include whooping cough or tuberculosis, HIV/AIDs, malaria, influenza (the flu), and mumps.[33] As low-to-middle income countries continue to develop, the types of diseases that affecting populations within these countries shifts primarily from infectious diseases, such as diarrhea and pneumonia, to primarily non-communicable diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, cancer and obesity. This shift is increasingly being referred to as the risk transition.[34][35] Thus, as globalization and the proliferation of pre-packaged foods continues, traditional diets and lifestyles are changing in many developing countries. As such, it is becoming increasingly common to see low-to-middle income countries battle with century old issues such as food insecurity and under nutrition, in addition to emerging health epidemics such as chronic heart disease, hypertension, stroke, and diabetes. Diseases once characteristic of industrialized nations, are increasingly becoming health challenges of epidemic proportions in many low-to-middle income countries.[36]

Economic impact[edit]

The economic impact of these rising rates and dual burdens of disease looks to be tremendous. Disability, decreased quality of life, greater use of health care facilities, and increased absenteeism are strong associated with obesity.[28] With inadequate resources, poorly construed health systems, and a general lack of expertise to address the burden of infective diseases, the disease burden for low-to-middle countries is exacerbated by the rising rate of non-communicable diseases. This is often attributed to the fact that these countries by nature have ill-health systems that possess inadequate resources to detect and prevent many non-communicable diseases.”[34] Social constructs within these countries often amplify the risk of the double burden, as inequality, gender, and other social determinants often have a role to play in disparate access and allocation of health services and resources.[34] If current trends are maintained, the World Health Organization predicts that low-and-middle income countries will be unable to support the burden of disease within the foreseeable future.

Implications for policy[edit]

Because of the nature of the dual burden of disease, most experts endorse a holistic approach to tackling the heath complications these nations will face rather than just focusing on reducing overnutrition. Public policy must be reengineered across a number of areas because of the interdisciplinary nature of this problem. These suggested areas include agriculture, manufacturing, retail, education, culture, trade, and economics.[3] Prevention is the most cost-effective method but few successful models exist.[26][37] Strategies should focus on especially at-risk populations such as women, youth, and the poor. School-based approaches and community initiatives have shown encouraging results.[28][38] Government interventions that place Pigovian taxes on unhealthy foods such as soft drinks and fast food, are controversial, but could manipulate the market in a way that would encourage healthier eating.[39] Other ways to manipulate the market include providing subsidies for healthier, unprocessed foods that would make them cheaper and more affordable for poorer populations.[3] Political debate arises over whether obesity is an outcome of individual behavior or a consequence of an increasingly obesogenic environment. In order to reduce obesity and its subsequent health and economic consequences, policy will need to be targeted at both the individual and the environment.[18]

Case studies[edit]

Case studies for individual nations are plentiful. The BRICS countries are specifically studied in great depth because of their rapidly transitioning economies, but more slowly developing nations are well studied too.

Industrialized nations[edit]

Case studies in the United States and United Kingdom are particularly bountiful.[3][40]

Developing countries[edit]

Reports based in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, North Africa, and developed areas of sub-Saharan Africa are easy to find.[10][16][25][41][42]

Aboriginal populations[edit]

Worldwide, Aboriginal populations have experienced radical changes in diet. Traditional diets and food intakes have been replaced by diets consisting of foods high in fat, sugar and salt.[43] This change in diet is related to the life-style changes during the last century: for example, Hunter-gatherer communities became more settled, and traditional food gathering methods changed. The nutrition transition has been linked to increased rates of non-communicable diseases amongst Aboriginal populations.[44] Industrialization introduced a less complicated way to access food; a protein rich diet was replaced by white bread, processed food and sugary beverages. A study conducted in northern Ontario proved that on-reserve food contributed to lower calorie and higher Ω-3 PUFA intake, which stabled the glucose level and prevents people from developing diabetes.[45] Traditional food of First Nations included burbot filet (or muscle) and moose liver. Food consumption provided essential fats (i.e., fatty acids) and proteins that played a key medicinal role in the prevention and reduction of obesity and obesity-related diseases.[46]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Popkin BM. "Nutritional Patterns and Transitions." Population and Development Review 19.1 (1993): 138-157
  2. ^ a b c Hawkes C. "Uneven Dietary Development: Linking the Policies and Processes of Globalization with the Nutrition Transition, Obesity, and Diet-Related Chronic Diseases." Global Health 2.4 (2006): 1-18
  3. ^ a b c d Lang T, and Rayner G. "Overcoming Policy Cacophony on Obesity: An Ecological Public Health Framework for Policymakers." Obesity Reviews 8.1 (2007): 165-181
  4. ^ a b c Chopra M, Galbraith S, and Darnton-Hill I. “A Global Response to a Global Problem: The Epidemic of Overnutrition.” ‘’Bulletin of the World Health Organization’’ 80 (2002): 952-958.
  5. ^ a b Popkin BM. “The Nutrition Transition and Obesity in the Developing World.” ‘’The Journal of Nutrition’’ 131 (2001): 871-873.
  6. ^ a b c d e Popkin BM. “The Nutrition Transition in the Developing World.” ‘’Development Policy Review’’ 21.5 (2003): 581-597.
  7. ^ a b Prentice AM. “The Emerging Epidemic of Obesity in Developing Countries.” ‘’International Journal of Epidemiology’’ 35 (2006): 93-99.
  8. ^ Schmidhuber J, and Shetty P. “The Nutrition Transition to 2030: Why Developing Countries Are Likely to Bear the Major Burden.” 97th Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists. University of Reading, England. 21-22 Apr. 2005.
  9. ^ Popkin BM. “Urbanization, Lifestyle Changes and the Nutrition Transition.” ‘’World Development’’ 27 (1999): 1905-1916.
  10. ^ a b c d e Hawkes C. “Globalization, Food, and Nutrition Transitions.” Washington, DC: IFPRI, (2007).
  11. ^ a b c Popkin BM. “Nutrition in Transition: The Changing Global Nutrition Challenge.” ‘’Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition’’ 10 (2001) 13-18.
  12. ^ Popkin BM. “An Overview of the Nutrition Transition and Its Health Implications: The Bellagio Meeting.” ‘’Public Health Nutrition’’ 5.1 (2002): 93-103.
  13. ^ a b c Popkin BM. “Does Global Obesity Represent a Global Public Health Challenge?” ‘’American Journal of Clinical Nutrition’’ 93.2 (2011): 232-233.
  14. ^ Drewnowski A, and Popkin BM. “The Nutrition Transition: New Trends in the Global Diet.” ‘’Nutrition Reviews’’ 55.2 (1997): 31-43.
  15. ^ a b Hawkes C, et al. “Diet Quality, Poverty, and Food Policy: A New Research Agenda for Obesity Prevention in Developing Countries.” ‘’SCN News’’ 29 (2005): 20-22.
  16. ^ a b Shufa D, et al. “Rapid Income Growth Adversely Affects Diet Quality in China- Particularly for the Poor!” ‘’Social Science and Medicine’’ 59 (2004): 1505-1515.
  17. ^ a b Brody J. “The Global Epidemic of Childhood Obesity: Poverty, Urbanization, and Nutrition Transition.” ‘’Nutrition Bytes’’ 8.2 (2002): 1-7.
  18. ^ a b Caballero B. “The Global Epidemic of Obesity: An Overview.” ‘’Epidemiologic Reviews’’ 29.1 (2007): 1-5.
  19. ^ Drewnowski, A. and Popkin, B. M. (1997), The Nutrition Transition: New Trends in the Global Diet. Nutrition Reviews, 55: 31–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1997.tb01593.
  20. ^ Monteiro, CA, Conde WL, and Popkin BM. “Obesity and Inequities in Health in the Developing World.” ‘’International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders’’ 28.9 (2004): 1181-1186.
  21. ^ Franco M, et al. “Neighborhood Characteristics and Availability of Healthy Foods in Baltimore.” ‘’American Journal of Preventive Medicine’’ 35.6 (2008): 561-567.
  22. ^ Caballero B. “A Nutrition Paradox: Underweight and Obesity in Developing Countries.” ‘’New England Journal of Medicine’’ 352.15 (2005): 1514-1516.
  23. ^ Tanumihardjo SA., et al. “Poverty, Obesity, and Malnutrition: An International Perspective Recognizing the Paradox.” ‘’Journal of the American Dietetic Association’’ 107.11 (2007): 1966-1972.
  24. ^ Vonke D. “The Paradox of Malnutrition in Developing Countries.” ‘’African Research’’ Review 5.19 (2011): 40-48.
  25. ^ a b Uauy R, Albala C, and Kain J. “Obesity Trends in Latin America: Transiting from Under- to Overweight.” ‘’The Journal of Nutrition’’ 131 (2001): 893-899.
  26. ^ a b Popkin BM. “Global Nutrition Dynamics: The World Is Shifting Rapidly Toward a Diet Linked with Noncommunicable Diseases.” ‘’American Journal of Clinical Nutrition’’ 84.2 (2006):289-298.
  27. ^ Popkin, BM, and Doak CM. “The Obesity Epidemic Is a Worldwide Phenomenon.” ‘’Nutrition Reviews’’ 56 (1998): 106-114.
  28. ^ a b c d e Misra A, and Khurana, L. “Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome in Developing Countries.” ‘’Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism’’ 93.11 (2008): 9-30.
  29. ^ “World Health Report 1997: Conquering Suffering, Enriching Humanity.” Geneva: World Health Organization, (1997).
  30. ^ "Non-Communicable Diseases Deemed Development Challenge of ‘Epidemic Proportions’ in Political Declaration Adopted During Landmark General Assembly Summit". Un.org. Retrieved 2013-08-02. 
  31. ^ "What is double burden of disease and what is the situation in Asia". Wiki.answers.com. 2013-06-17. Retrieved 2013-08-02. 
  32. ^ Vancouver Coastal Health (2013-01-16). "Communicable Diseases -Vancouver Coastal Health". Vch.ca. Retrieved 2013-08-02. 
  33. ^ http://www.eldis.org/index.cfm?objectId=23544C91-C547-7229-A18D7D1FA3A05E4Bhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC546417/
  34. ^ a b c "WHO/Europe | Noncommunicable diseases". Euro.who.int. 2013-06-14. Retrieved 2013-08-02. 
  35. ^ [1][dead link]
  36. ^ "WHO | 2. Background". Who.int. Retrieved 2013-08-02. 
  37. ^ Darton-Hill I, Nishida C, and James WP. “A Life Course Approach to Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases.” ‘’Public Health Nutrition’’ 7.1 (2004): 101-121.
  38. ^ Story, M. “School-Based Approaches for Preventing and Treating Obesity.” ‘’International Journal of Obesity’’ 23.2 (1999): 43-51.
  39. ^ Popkin BM. “Economists’ Insights Into the Obesity Crisis.” ‘’Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism’’ 20.9 (2009): 417.
  40. ^ Popkin BM. “Recent Dynamics Suggest Selected Countries Catching Up to US Obesity.” ‘’American Journal of Clinical Nutrition’’ 91.1 (2010): 284-288.
  41. ^ Moktar N, et al. “Diet Culture and Obesity in Northern Africa.” ‘’The Journal of Nutrition’’ 131 (2001): 887-892.
  42. ^ Popkin BM. “The Shift in Stages of the Nutrition Transition in the Developing World Differs from Past Experiences!” ‘’Public Health Nutrition’’ 5.1 (2002): 205-214.
  43. ^ Sharma S. (2010) - Assessing diet and lifestyle in the Canadian Arctic Inuit and Inuvialuit to inform a nutrition and physical activity intervention programme. Journal of Human Nutrition and Diet. 1:5-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01093.x
  44. ^ H. V. Kuhnlein; O. Receveur; R. Soueida and G. M. Egeland (2004) - Arctic Indigenous Peoples Experience the Nutrition Transition with Changing Dietary Patterns and Obesity. The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 134:1447-1453.
  45. ^ Socha, Teresa; Chambers, Lori; Zahaf, Mehdi; Abraham, Rawnda; Fiddler, Terri. (2011). Food availability, food store management and food pricing in a northern community. First Nation Community. In International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 1, No. 11.
  46. ^ Robidoux, Michael; Haman, Francois & Sethna, Christabelle. (2008). The Relationship of the Burbot (Lota lota L.) to the Reintroduction of Off-the-Land Foods in the Sandy Lake First Nation Community. In Biodemography and Social Biology, Vol. 55, p. 12–29.

External links[edit]