Jump to content

Talk:102nd Intelligence Wing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:102d Intelligence Wing)
Former good article102nd Intelligence Wing was one of the Warfare good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 27, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
June 10, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
July 15, 2008Good article nomineeListed
July 23, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
August 11, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
November 23, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
January 8, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
October 31, 2009WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
May 9, 2010WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
March 8, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 14, 2011WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
December 14, 2016WikiProject A-class reviewDemoted
January 7, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

  • There are uncited statements throughout the article, including almost the entire "History" section.
  • The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article.

Is anyone interested in addressing the above concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 04:14, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article contains numerous uncited statements, including almost the entire "History" section. The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article. Globalsecurity.com is used numerous times as a reference, but per WP:GLOBALSECURITY it is considered an unreliable source; these inline citations will need to be replaced with reliable sources or the information it is verifying removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.