Talk:Anna of Russia

Russia: History Top‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Women's History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Old talk[edit]

"foolish and ignorant maids" "struggle on the part of Russia to cover her 'natural and legitimate' southern boundaries " This is not NPOV...

This is the phrasing of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, so you have to live with it... --Ghirlandajo 12:56, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That it was in the 1911 EB doesn't make it NPOV. One can hardly call lands which had been occupied by Turks for almost 1,000 years the natural and legitimate southern boundaries of Russia.Chegitz guevara 18:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ghirlando: We don't have to "live with" anything. The 1911 Encyclopeida is a source. Anyone is free to edit it.

Chegitz: Edit!

Oh, and what the hell does "died of surfeit" mean?

Mrrhum 14:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough[edit]

For some reason, I couldn't find a single mention of Anna in any paper encyclopedias.

Anna Ivanovna and the Ice Palace[edit]

The history of the Ice Palace does not at all match the one in the [|Ice Palace] Article. In either case, the truth of the two should be verified and the [|Ice Palace] article should be considered as a stub of this article. -- Cyrillika 17:47 GMT+1, 20 December 2005

Anna or Anne?[edit]

Anne is the english version of her name. Why is her name germanized on this Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.250.113.213 (talk) 15:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Germanised? Hardly. Anna was her Russian name, and she's much more often known as Anna than as Anne in English-speaking countries. -- JackofOz (talk) 09:45, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reign as Duchess of Courland 1711-1730[edit]

Why did she became Regent in Courland? What was her status? Was she declared a monarch, a regent, or a governor?--85.226.42.215 (talk) 21:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. Favonian (talk) 17:37, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anna of Russia → Anna, Empress of Russia – per WP:NCROY where it is specified that when a nation had one monarch bearing a specific name, the format John, King of England or Anne, Queen of Great Britain is preferred. – Relisted Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 04:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator. --Alexcoldcasefan (talk) 10:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The article should remain as it is. I don't like this policy. The newly inflicted policy has not taken root on Wikipedia. I see many articles like Joanna of Castile and many others. I feel a full discussion listing all these articles should be made, but I will still oppose it. I have a feeling that this discussion isn't going to attract much attention. --The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 04:25, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Greater clarity and ties in with the convention for dukes, etc, used by many sources. The current title begs the question "Anna, what of Russia?". --Bermicourt (talk) 05:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Idiotic policies leading to unnecessary complications should be ignored. --Ghirla^-трёп- 08:55, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Idiotic policies leading to unnecessary complications should be ignored. Film Fan (talk) 21:28, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Lineage to Anna Ivanovna[edit]

                             Roman Rostislavich Roman I of Kiev (d. 1180)
                                           |
                             MstIslav Romanovich (Mstislav III of Kiev)

I am suggesting that the above may be ancesters of Catherine and Anna Ivanova. - See below. RCNesland RCNesland (talk) 19:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RCNesland RCNesland (talk) 19:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

                                           |
                                 Roman Yurievich (d. 1543)
                                           |
                                      Nikita (d. 1586)
                                           |
                                        Filaret (d. 1633)
                                           |
                                        Mikhail I (d. 1645)
                                           |
                                        Alexis I (d. 1676)
                                           |
                                         Ivan V (d 1696)
                                            |
                                      Anna Ivanovna (d. 1740)

- Notes by RCNesland ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by RCNesland (talk • contribs) 21:37, 15 July 2012 (UTC) Notes by RCNesland continue[reply]

Decendants of Ivan V (d. 1696)

                                                      |              |
                                   Catherine Ivanovna (1691-1733) Anna Ivanovna (1693-1740)
                                                      |
                                              Anna Lepoldovna (d. 1746)
                                                      |                                               
                                                   Ivan VI (d, 1764) - RCNesland ----

Karl Leopold, Duke of Mecklenburg-Schwerin (1678-1747) married Catherine Ivanovna.

                                         Karl Leopold - Catherine Ivanovna
                                                      |
                                               Anna Leopoldovna
                                                      |
                                                   Ivan VI  RCNesland (talk) 09:07, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Poulett Thompson (1700-????) and Anna Ivanovna

                                     Andrew Poulett Thompson - Anna Ivanovna 
                                                             | 
                                                   John Julius Angerstein (1732-????) 
 RCNesland (talk) 06:22, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Her son - John Julius Angerstein?[edit]

Per Wikipedia's page on John Julius Angerstein, his family tradition holds that his biological parents were Anna of Russia and the London businessman, Andrew Poulett Thompson. Does anyone think this should be mentioned on Anna's page? There doesn't seem to be any evidence to support such a relationship, just "family tradition." June w (talk) 02:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanck you June for the info. RCNesland (talk) 06:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recursive and Unreliable Sources[edit]

This Wikipedia page links back to the Factinate site "Unhinged Facts About Anna Of Russia, The Mad Tsarina" which is a very pulpy and uncredible trivia site. The Factinate page also links back to Wikipedia as a source, which confuses the point of origin for much of this information. Blightmorde (talk) 21:12, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should remove content sourcing from a site like that, definitely Danial Bass (talk) 21:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]