This article disgraces Wikipedia
This article is insulting to the very idea of Wikipedia. The page is wholly absent any substantive, or meaningful content, and it resembles a CGI website page more than an encyclopedic article. The mysterious deletions and selectively neglected details are astonishing. If this is the route we're going to take, why not just lock the article and turn it over to CGI to write themselves?
I hope this sort of activity is halted, and we can actually work together to construct a real page.
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Is it me or this turn into a POV CGI pamphlet? --Elsan 01:25, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
We gotta watch out for shills and be doubly careful about what is being reported in the news. The NPR piece is odd, it reported a very significant and juicy bit that CGI Group had its contract with the Province of Ontario government terminated because it failed to deliver on their health project. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 18:14, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Relevant but not specific to Health Exchange Failures
- eHealth Ontario Diabetes Registry
Is anyone going to document and update and connect this article to the significant breaking news of their failures to supply a working solution for obamacare? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 04:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- How about documenting ETS Scandal? XOttawahitech (talk) 16:03, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- I also believe there is controversy surrounding the Vermont Health Connect system and CGI FederalShadowfaxes (talk) 17:49, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- There is something funky about these guys. They were involved in a failed eHealth Diabetes registry in Ontario.
- Under the terms of the six-year “alternative financing and procurement” contract, CGI — not taxpayers — will be on the hook for the $10 million to $15 million spent on the project. That’s because the company, which launched its work in August 2010, has apparently failed to meet deadlines imposed by eHealth and set out in the agreement. A separate diabetes registry, which was supposed to be up and running on June 30, 2011, is no longer needed because 9,000 Ontario doctors are already using eHealth’s EMR 4.1 system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 12:28, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- More on the trail of CGI Group
Here's more links: Canadian Governor General David Johnston was head of CGI's Board of Directors at the time Harper appointed him, & he is a MAJOR CGI stockholder. Johnston attended Harvard & has a substantial U.S. connection, including that he is the only non-American citizen to chair the Harvard Board of Overseers ...
CGI is connected to spying & data collection for the NSA...
"The director of the National Security Agency, Gen. Keith B. Alexander, said in an interview"...
"Perspectives from Gen. Keith B. Alexander of NSA AND CGI"...
The woman speaking in the above video is:
Contracts with Infrastructure Canada Harper & his CONS awarded CGI after they gained power, worth $51,184,628.66...
CGI was bought by American Management Systems, a.k.a. AMS, in 2004. AMS, who assumed CGI's name to pursue a global takeover...are key partners with the U.S. Government & military...
"CGI...For more than 30 years, we’ve partnered with U.S. defense, civilian, and intelligence agencies"... http://www.nhdf.org/7-national-symposium/exhibitors/whos-exhibiting/cgi
"Bell and CGI have won multimillion dollar contract to run the federal government’s consolidated email system. The $398 million deal was announced as part of Ottawa’s project to bring a number of IT systems under one roof..."...
"Stanley acquired by CGI, is an information technology company based in Arlington, Virginia...The company’s largest customer is U.S. Army...U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Navy, Department of State, & Department of Homeland Security."...
Ancillary comments above are not my own, but copypastes, edited for more overt POV content, from forum comments by WakeUpCallToAll on http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/10/13/governor-general-china-investment_n_4092253.html
I think CGI or a subsidiary may have been the company who ran the electronic voting for the New Democratic Party leadership convention in Montreal, which had a major system failure on the final ballot, but I`m not certain about that. NB it's a given that this page is monitored.126.96.36.199 (talk) 17:41, 25 October 2013 (UTC)