Talk:Grade I listed buildings in Bath and North East Somerset

Grade I listed buildings in Bath and North East Somerset is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Grade I listed buildings in Bath and North East Somerset is part of the Grade I listed buildings in Somerset series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 26, 2009	Featured list candidate	Promoted
November 21, 2009	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured list

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Somerset Mid‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

663 GV I buildings?[edit]

I think this number - 663 - must be seriously mistaken, and the source used has taken a really big mistake. Leaving apart that this would mean 10% of all the listed buildings - more than Greater London, that has just 569 GV I buildings, Heritage Counts provides a number of 99 [1] (updated 2006), while IoE states they are 98 [2] (updated 2001). Unless some confirmation is found that there are well more than 100, I'd say 663 should be removed. Thoughts?--Aldux (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My source for this number (as cited in the article) is Owning a Listed Building (BANES) where it says "Bath & North East Somerset has 663 Grade I listed buildings, one of the highest concentrations in the country". As discussed elsewhere I believe the number is because of the number of buildings - where one EH listing can cover a whole road of 20 + buildings. As BANES has responsibility under the act for enforcement I don't see why their figure should not be believed.— Rod ^talk 16:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had noticed the source, actually; only, it seemed so enormous and distant from EH's numbers that it made me suspect an error - after all, even the most reliable sources can make quite impressive errors. If the difference resides in the reason you stated, wouldn't it be better to provide both numbers - the buildings and the official number of listed entries - instead of just one? Just my personal 2 cents; I'm currently too occupied with my work and with Suffolk listings to do anything else except than bugging you. Ciao,--Aldux (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bug away. I've added a note to the article saying c 100 EH listings. I'm aiming to come back to this list later, but a few others to do first.— Rod ^talk 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Converting OSGB36 (OS grid refs) to coords on this list and others[edit]

I have started a discussion about converting the OSGB36 (OS grid refs) on this list and others to use Template:Coord, as I think this offers advantages for users worldwide (who may be unfamiliar with the OS system) and the use of Template:GeoGroupTemplate to enable mapping on googlemaps etc. I have been told that a bot could be tasked to do this, however this would be quite a significant change and would not want to do it without consensus. If anyone has any comments could they join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#Automagically converting OSGB36 to coord?.— Rod ^talk 16:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Grade I listed buildings in Bath and North East Somerset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080130105206/http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1995/Uksi_19950493_en_1.htm to http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1995/Uksi_19950493_en_1.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/bathnes/leisureandculture/tourismandtravel/areainformation/default.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101123105000/http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/environmentandplanning/Conservation/listedbuildingsinformationadvice/Pages/owningalistedbuilding.aspx to http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/ENVIRONMENTANDPLANNING/CONSERVATION/LISTEDBUILDINGSINFORMATIONADVICE/Pages/owningalistedbuilding.aspx
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/worldheritage/2.3Des.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/worldheritage/3Append.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]