Talk:Hoga (YT-146)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeHoga (YT-146) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 7, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

chronology[edit]

parts of this article need to be re-written on chronological order. This will avoid the repetitation of certain statements. Hmains 06:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Failed GA nom[edit]

This article lacks a lead as per WP:LEAD. The lead paragraph is supposed to summarise information given in the rest of the article. The lead of this article, however, not only does not summarise the rest of the article but also includes information not found elsewhere in the article. Furthermore, the article digresses on topics not immediately relevant to the topic, like a rather detailed narrative of the actions of the USS Nevada at Pearl Harbor. Thirdly, this section:

Throwing lines to the stricken repair ship, Hoga helped pull Vestal away from Arizona at 8:30 hours (military time is cited throughout this study).

The phrase "this study" makes me suspect this is either copy-vio or original research, both of which are not to be included on Wikipedia. This is obviously inconclusive evidence, but I find it enough grounds for rejection of the article for GA. Lastly, the article could use some more inline citations, though this is not as critical as the previous issues. Druworos 12:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoga (YT-146). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]