Talk:List of ships present at International Fleet Review 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of ships present at International Fleet Review 2013 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

Australia: New South Wales / Maritime Low‑importance

	Australia portal List of ships present at International Fleet Review 2013 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph of ships present at IFR be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Australia may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

List currency[edit]

The article uses as main reference the list of ships in the IFR official website, however that was of the ships that were expected to participate... is there any other source that can confirm the ships that are actually now in Sydney Harbour? Regards, DPdH (talk) 09:24, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a partial list of vessels in port. Still looking for another full list. Acalycine^talk 08:01, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IFR Pics needed![edit]

Dear wikipedians, it'd be great if at least 1 pic of each ship listed, taken during the IFR, is included in this article. I'll try to find some. Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 08:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete[edit]

This list is incomplete, it fails to mention the ships from Nigeria, PNG, Tonga, Micronesia and possibly other nations that were present. I am fairly certain that PNG actually sent two vessels. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.2.69.224 (talk) 23:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to add entries for those ships that are missing and were present at the IFR, provided that they are cited to verifiable sources. Regards, DPdH (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of ships present at International Fleet Review 2013. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:lxBMmhUJDRkJ:shipschedule.sydneyports.com.au/marineoperations/movements.asp+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=au&client=firefox-a, with https://web.archive.org/web/20130820114333/http://shipschedule.sydneyports.com.au/marineoperations/movements.asp on http://shipschedule.sydneyports.com.au/marineoperations/movements.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]