This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I propose to merge Gubernatorial recall effort against Mike Dunleavy into Mike Dunleavy. I think that the content in the Gubernatorial recall effort against Mike Dunleavy article can easily be explained in the context of Mike Dunleavy, and the Mike Dunleavy article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Gubernatorial recall effort against Mike Dunleavy will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. SecretName101 (talk) 15:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think that it is premature for an independent article to exist. When it results in an election (or appears all but certain to, like the 2021 California gubernatorial recall election at the moment), then it would be more appropriate for it to be a stand-alone article, in my opinion. If the recall effort were more complex, or there was more information on Wikipedia about it than would be appropriate to fit in the Mike Dunleavy article, then it could be justified as a stand-alone article regardless of whether it results in an election, but it does not seem that it warrants that length of coverage at the moment. SecretName101 (talk) 13:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like this article should be kept for now. If the recall petition ultimately doesn't go anywhere, then it can definitely be deleted and the relevant content merged to the relevant articles. Love of Corey (talk) 22:04, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I also think there is enough coverage of this effort to merit an article at this time; if it fails(though even Dunleavy seems to think it will get there) we can deal with this then. Note that there was a Supreme Court decision on this matter. 331dot (talk) 12:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think now that since the article has been expanded and covers more content, including polling data, it probably is now broad enough to be a standalone article SecretName101 (talk) 13:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Redirect, until/if a recall election is scheduled. GoodDay (talk) 08:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the most recent comment by SecretName101. There is (now) more than enough content in this article to suggest that th subject passes WP:GNG. —Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 21:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, since the recall effort failed, it's only appropriate to make it a section of Mike Dunleavy's article Ravens (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge, the recall campaign gave up; this should just by included in the Dunleavy article. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 16:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support merger. Dunleavy is on the ballot for reelection in November 2022. Activist (talk) 22:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The Political Positions section could probably include a subsection on his positions and actions on the PFD. — al-Shimoni (talk) 05:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
