Talk:Monte di Pietà

Monte di Pietà is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Merger[edit]

Actually I am not sure whether the merged article should end up at Monte di Pietà, Mont de Piété or Montes pietatis. I’ve only ever heard it in the Italian form and naturally generalised that to guess that most people will expect to find it there. Britannica Online uses the Latin. —Ian Spackman (talk) 09:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that a merger of the two duplicate articles should take place, with the name to be agreed by experts in the subject. -- MightyWarrior (talk) 11:46, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the singular, as most titles in Wikipedia are meant to be, this would be Mons Pietatis. No reason to have a French name for an institution organised by Franciscans, and first in Italy. I feel as though I'm in a minority creating redirects so articles don't get lost. None of these are very good, btw. --Wetman (talk) 12:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]