Talk:St Ffinan's Church, Llanffinan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSt Ffinan's Church, Llanffinan has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 2, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 11, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that unlike most other churches in the Welsh county of Anglesey, St Ffinan's Church was built in Romanesque revival style?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:St Ffinan's Church, Llanffinan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:Dr. Blofeld 11:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Can you state the location in Anglesey, road its on, nearby landmarks, nearest biggest town in the intro, like I suggested in the first review.
  • Can you reference the fact that the church is Romanesque revival in the main body?
Added some details.
Duplicated reference. Was that what you were after? BencherliteTalk 14:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's perfect, thanks.


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

This is a quality article which meets all of the GA criteria, short, but very well focused and written, the way an encyclopedia article should be. It's not ready for FA though yet, I think more detail would be needed for that. Another good job, I'm promoting this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]