Talk:TPC-C

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TPC-C article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from TPC-C appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the first official result for the TPC-C benchmark (testing pictured) in 1992 was 54, and now stands at 707 million?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/TPC-C.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 05:56, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Running a TPC-C test

... that the TPC-C benchmark, used to speed-test databases (pictured), originated with an unreleased product at Digital Equipment Corp? Source: Chen/Rabb/Catz 3.1
- ALT1: ... that the first official result for the TPC-C benchmark (testing pictured) in 1992 was 33, and now stands at 707 million? Source: TPC-C web site

Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 11:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Article is new, large enough. It is cited and free of copyvio, and read with an encylopedic tone. The Correct person is credited. Picture is used and free, and gives some clue as to a test. alt0 comes to 123 characters. However the article does not mention that the product RdbStar was unreleased. Alt1 is 115 characters. For alt1 that 707 million is not a current standing, but the record. So alt1 must be clarified before we can use it. I propose:

- ALT1a: ... that the first official result for the TPC-C benchmark (testing pictured) in 1992 was 54, and the record now stands at 707 million?

Also @Maury Markowitz: there will have to be a QPQ review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett: My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

QPQ checks out, in that case good to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maury Markowitz: any chance you could cite the hooks inline before I promote? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 07:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Renumbered a bit, 9 and 11. I've been told (by the benchmark's developer himself) that it was 33, but this source says 54. Makes no different in the end, so we'll go with 54. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 to T:DYK/P3