Talk:Two Hundred Rabbits

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 05:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that a dream from reading a French folk tale inspired Lonzo Anderson to write Two Hundred Rabbits? Source: P.T. (1968-03-16). "Couple Writes Child's Book About Rabbits". The Courier-News. Bridgewater, New Jersey. p. 14. Retrieved 2023-04-08 – via Newspapers.com.

Created by Slgrandson (talk). Self-nominated at 01:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Two Hundred Rabbits; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Both articles are well expanded and fairly sourced. Long and new enough as well. Now the hook begins with ...that a dream from reading a French folk tale inspired.
Isn't from meant to say after? Then the hook (with my adaption) is cited but only included in the article about the book and not the author. Is it possible to include a phrase about his inspiration on the dream? Thank you for the answers and also creating two interesting to read articles.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

QPQ: No - ?
Overall: Articles are new and long enough. Fairly sourced though I assume AGF on the ones I didn't access. Hook Alt1 appears in both articles. Good to go, if the QPQ issue is solved. Do you need a QPQ (to review a DYK as well) or not? If you have nominated less than five articles yet, you do not need a QPQ.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 04:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, Slgrandson we have patience. A QPQ is a review of another DYK nomination. For this, you need to read an article nominated for DYK, then check if if the article is well sourced, hook is sourced, article is long enough, new enough etc. If you need any more help with this, let me know.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay as well. All good for Alt1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paradise Chronicle (talkcontribs) 06:54, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]