Template talk:Ichnobox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
03:22, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[edit]

Added support for |greatgreatgrandparent_authority= to correct a glitch when the great-great grandparent displays. Bob the WikipediaN (talkcontribs) 03:22, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Consistency with Taxoboxes[edit]

Is there a reason that this doesn't call Template:Taxobox/core? Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 17:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Only that I didn't want to intrude on it, although I think it's probably a good idea now that I've got the basics working. I finally found the bit that italicizes the genus and species names. smile I'll see about adapting the {{Taxobox/core}} to handle it now. Bob the Wikipedian (talkcontribs) 20:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Done. So simple it was actually scary. Bob the Wikipedian (talkcontribs) 21:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
This is a good idea, but wouldn't it be nice if the colour scheme was different from the animal taxobox? So one would see that the article is about an ichnotaxon at once. FunkMonk (talk) 09:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
What color would you like? Here's a table of the colors currently in use:
Animalia rgb(211,211,164)
Archaeplastida rgb(144,238,144) (palegreen2)
Fungi rgb(173,216,230) (lightblue)
Chromalveolata rgb(173,238,63)
Rhizaria rgb(225,204,252)
Excavata rgb(240,230,140) (khaki)
Amoebozoa rgb(255,200,160)
Bacteria rgb(211,211,211) (lightgray)
Archaea rgb(236,210,210)
Viruses rgb(238,130,238) (violet)
incertae sedis rgb(250,240,230) (linen)
Colours not produced by this template:
Ichnotaxa rgb(221, 165, 127)
Ootaxa rgb(255,192,203) (pink)
Bob the Wikipedian (talkcontribs) 04:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Hmmm, I'm thinking something earthy... Brown? Grey? FunkMonk (talk) 13:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
New color is "peru". How's it look? Bob the Wikipedian (talkcontribs) 03:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
I've made it a little paler to improve the contrast – hope that that's okay. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 14:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Looks good to me! FunkMonk (talk) 15:48, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Upgrading to the next version of {{str find}}[edit]

Per the recent modifications to {{strfind short}}, it has been advised this faster and more capable template take the place of {{str find}} where possible. Because {{PAGENAMEBASE}} is a structural template at the foundation of the code of this template, this edit could potentially cause havoc if not evaluated first for soundness.

I'm requesting anyone who has enough know-how to evaluate this proposed modification respond to the RfC listed at Template talk:PAGENAMEBASE. The template is being used in this template. Bob the WikipediaN (talkcontribs) 03:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)