User:Ritchie333

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Due to forgetfulness and growing old, changes newer than 22 years may not appear in this list.

My creative side
Ritchie333
Wikipediholic mug.jpg
Wikipedia. It's a mug's game, really
Born yes
Known for edits, mostly
Nuvola apps kdmconfig.png This user may sometimes share an IP address with: Rhondamerrick.
Noia 64 apps karm.svg This user has been on Wikipedia for 8 years, 4 months and 10 days.
Wikipedia-logo.png
This user has made over
16,000 edits on Wikipedia.
Editor - silver star.jpg This editor is a Veteran Editor III
and is entitled to display this
Silver Editor Star.
Million award logo.svg This user won the Million Award for bringing The Who to Good Article status.
Peter Hammill.jpg
This user likes Van der Graaf Generator, and thinks you should too if your ears are ready for it.
Don't abbreviate as Wiki (no text).png This user feels physical pain when hearing others refer to Wikipedia as "Wiki".
British dimpled glass pint jug with ale.jpg
This user prefers having a pint to collecting barnstars, though if you'd like to give me a barnstar anyway, that's okay.
Obscured jaguar.jpg Beware! This user is a known talk page stalker.
Curlycat02.jpg
This user loves cats and prefers to spend some time with them when he sees an argument approaching.
Candylol.jpg
This user thinks anyone who uses the phrase LOL in anything other than an ironic or humorous context should be taken outside and summarily shot for the greater good of humanity.
2134 pending submissions
This user is a participant in WikiProject Articles for creation. You can help!
WikiProject Musical Instruments This user is a member of the
Musical Instruments WikiProject.
Fender Stratocaster Headstock.jpg This user is a part of
WikiProject Rock music
Beatles logo.svg This user is a member of
WikiProject The Beatles.
Dispersion prism.jpg This user is a member of the Pink Floyd WikiProject.

Ritchie333 is a thirtysomething software engineer, musician and real ale drinker.

Shortcuts[edit]

Zen and the art of Wikipedia Maintenance[edit]

Domestos Reliable Sources. Kills all A7s. Dead.
Soft words turneth away ANI threads.
  1. Always have sources to hand when creating and expanding articles. Don't write articles based upon your own personal hypotheses and inferences. Don't write articles based upon knowledge that you half-remember learning, but have no idea from where or from whom. Write articles based upon actual, concrete, sources[1], and ensure that the article cites those sources. If you half-remember something, go and hunt up a source that covers it first, then write.[2] If you don't do this, expect your articles to be speedy deleted, nominated for deletion or asking the AfC help desk why your article was declined. Or, if you're really lucky, Rick Wakeman will (quite justifiably) denounce your work as a load of lies and rubbish.
  2. Calculus is good for mathematicians, and it's good for Wikipedians too. Don't worry about how competent an editor is now - focus on the first derivative and worry about their rate of competence change. A good newbie can teach themselves to become more competent. A bad newbie never will.
  3. In any debate about the merits of a musical act, be it solo or band, as discussion continues, the probability of comparing the perceived quality of the act to Justin Bieber approaches 1.
  4. Every time you start a thread on WP:ANI, God[3] kills a kitten.
  5. My own wikocratic oath is : First, cause no drama'.'[4]
  6. I really wish wikilawyering were against policy.[5]
  7. If you want help on Wikipedia, pretend you're female, attractive and about 20. You'll get a much better response, because on the Internet, nobody knows you look like Anne Widdecombe. (Especially if you are Anne Widdecombe, in which case you might want to read WP:PROUD).
  8. If somebody tells you to "get a life", they might have a point. Enjoy editing Wikipedia, but don't let it consume you, and make sure you experience the real world enough to get perspective on things. Especially if you have a wife and kids.
  9. When people have problems with editing wiki markup, it's a problem with the software's poor interface, not the end user.
  10. There is a prejudice against IP editors. IP editing is a good way for newcomers to just start contributing and removing a huge barrier to entry. It's also a good way to vandalise stuff. Fortunately, unlike race and nationality, it's trivial to stop being an IP editor. If you don't like the policy, you are of course free to start your own wiki and make it very popular.
  11. If you see an angry rant on a talk page about your revert to that article that talks about "the truth" but ends with — Preceding unsigned comment added by..., you can probably ignore it. If it's an IP, you probably can rest safe that your revert hasn't even been touched.
  12. There is no race to be "first" to answer a question on WP:HD, WP:RD, WP:AFCHD and WP:ANI .... all you get is an edit conflict with SineBot for your troubles if you're lucky.
  13. If you want to be an admin, find your best friend's car, take out the rotor arm, slash the tyres, then tell them to their face you did it. If you can survive the abuse you get back, you might have what it takes.
  14. Twinkle has a lot of magic buttons to automate tasks. None of them are for writing content and adding sources. The best content editors ignore twinkle, and vice versa.
  15. Any talk page discussion anywhere that involves infoboxes or microformats will involve aggression, name calling and appeal to emotion. Anyone would think we were writing an encyclopedia here or something.
  16. Assume good faith can mean deleting an article or doing a blanket revert, then apologising to affected editors that you needed to do it.
  17. Those that can, do. Those that can't, bicker about the manual of style or the citation guidelines. I mean, who cares that somebody's falsely accused of murder - just put that bloody full stop BEFORE the ref tag.
  18. Make your articles good or utterly brilliant if you so wish, but beware the lure of the rubber stamp and remember that if it doesn't improve the encyclopedia, balls to it.
  19. If somebody really wants to win an argument, just let them. You'll live. As Mark Twain put it, "Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of good example."[6](other religious magazines are available)
  20. If I see one more editor throw the term WP:RS at a newbie without explaining what it stands for and why it's relevant, I will scream.
  21. One of the most dangerous habits you can get into is to take Wikipedia too seriously. Dozens of editors have been indefinitely blocked at ANI and Arbcom because the encyclopedia is super-duper important and blocking them is soooooo unfair.
  22. Domestos Reliable Sources. Kills all AfDs. Dead.

Other essays[edit]

In mainspace[edit]

In here[edit]

One revert guarantee[edit]

If you think one of my edits makes the encyclopedia worse, revert it. Please try and leave a good edit summary or discuss it on the talk page, though. In return, I pledge I will only revert your changes once and once only, if at all. If you revert back again, then I'll go to the talk page. Or I might decide you're correct. Either way, I have no more right to edit this place than you.

Notability on bands[edit]

I will generally turn down a nomination for speedy deletion based on lack of perceived importance if an article about a band appears to be more significant than Dumpy's Rusty Nuts. However, many band articles can't even manage that.

Things to do[edit]

  • Music sequencer : A complete train wreck. Needs sourcing, generally.
  • Shepherd Neame Brewery : You drink enough of their bloody stuff, go and work on their article! You will want to get Barker's book from the local library.

My Wikipedia Humour[edit]

My favourite vandalism[edit]

These edits all got instantly reverted for being completely bad faith, but that doesn't mean I didn't laugh at them while they got heaved out of the window....

References[edit]

  1. ^ Reliable sources are many and varied but are generally not : Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Soundcloud, blogs (that aren't written by notable journalists for the New York Times or something of that level) and the website you created yesterday
  2. ^ User:Uncle G/On sources and content#Always work from and cite sources
  3. ^ or another suitable deity of your choice
  4. ^ NE Ent (30 October 2012). "kitchen, heat". ANI. 
  5. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AEditor_assistance%2FRequests&diff=548472838&oldid=548464648
  6. ^ Year of Grace: A Daily Companion. Rowman & Littlefield. 1999. p. 27. ISBN 9781580510622.