User talk:67.86.58.61

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

August 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. An edit that you recently made to Penn Badgley seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 03:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Matthew Arkin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please do not add categories that do not exist on Wikipedia. TJRC (talk) 03:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The Arkin family is in no way deserving of Its own category?--67.86.58.61 (talk) 17:22, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I express no opinion on whether it's deserving of a category. But the fact is that there is no such category now, so adding a category markup to an article just breaks things. TJRC (talk) 17:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How about what could be a given, If you have a family with multiple members of some note, that category automatically is created? You have to be told this?--67.86.58.61 (talk) 17:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category creation is not automatic, any more than any other page is. Please have a look at WP:CATEGORY.

I don't know of a way for an unregistered user to request the addition of a category. You could try at Wikipedia:Requested articles or failing that, at Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous). TJRC (talk) 17:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sara Niemietz, you may be blocked from editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 22:22, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Naya Rivera. Enough is enough. © Tbhotch^™ 23:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You should be blocked for the disgusting condescension of putting in a sound spelling for Naya Rivera when she never had it before, EVER! Wikipedia logic, the more famous a person gets, the harder it will be for people to pronounce that person's name.--67.86.58.61 (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Today in first-world problems: IPA pronunciation on a deceased subject. © Tbhotch^™ 00:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

IPA and stub tag removal[edit]

What's your reasoning for removing the IPAs from articles as you did here: [1] or removing stub tags from articles, as you did here: [2], here: [3]? I've reverted those edits,as they seem to be vandalism. David O. Johnson (talk) 00:56, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sage Stallone have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Again? (CC) Tbhotch^™ 01:25, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You don't think the Stallone family is worthy of a separate category?--67.86.58.61 (talk) 01:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were told already to first request the category to be created (Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories), then add them to the articles. But this is for the {{Sylvester Stallone}}. If you pay attention this is a "Works by Sylvester Stallone" not a "Sylvester Stallone-related articles template". (CC) Tbhotch^™ 01:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an idea, why not redo the template so it CAN include the Stallone family? You people really do lack in common sense.--67.86.58.61 (talk) 12:26, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing by adding categories and templates to articles where they are not relevant in spite of being asked to stop and being blocked for it previously. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fresnel lens, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Zooey Deschanel. Sundayclose (talk) 20:53, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020[edit]

Can you not remove IPAs and stub tags, please. They are in articles for a reason. David O. Johnson (talk) 01:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Keaton. Binksternet (talk) 04:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding non-existent cats. Meters (talk) 21:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Quantupediholic. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jeopardy! without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Quantupediholic (talk) 22:10, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Desert Song, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Magatta (talk) 23:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. General Ization ^Talk 02:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.