User talk:72.142.92.204

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

November 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Prohibitions in Sikhism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Prohibitions in Sikhism was changed by 72.142.92.204 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958735 on 2020-11-09T23:00:43+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Live a little 72.142.92.204 (talk) 10:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to American Family Field—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Flibirigit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Don Cherry have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Flibirigit (talk) 13:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When has Don Cherry ever deserved the reverence he expects? 72.142.92.204 (talk) 10:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Zsohl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Fabelmans—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Zsohl ^(Talk) 04:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was funny though. You have to give me that. 72.142.92.204 (talk) 04:08, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Pat Tabler, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikipedialuva (talk) 10:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Golda (film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:27, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's common knowledge. 72.142.92.204 (talk) 02:28, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aladdin (franchise), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You allow articles to be written without credible sources or fact checking. Then you set a higher standard for correcting the errors or modifying the pages. WTF? 72.142.92.204 (talk) 10:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Pat Tabler. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not truly an encyclopedia. Let's not be ridiculous. You're taking this way too seriously. Was my post not accurate? Pat Tabler is not a juggler, sheep herder etc. 72.142.92.204 (talk) 10:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Short. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear me. Whatever shall I do? 72.142.92.204 (talk) 10:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Short would enjoy the editing. You lack a sense of humor. 72.142.92.204 (talk) 10:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. 72.142.92.204 (talk) 11:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pat Tabler, you may be blocked from editing. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 10:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can't really block people from editing pages or having fun. Not when they have multiple devices available to them. All you can really do is restrict or prevent editing. Which defeats the purpose of the model. Of course Wikipedia is poorly written, poorly sourced. You're hoping that by opening it up to every fool with internet access you'll do something better than the academics who produce real encyclopedias. Before you put them out of business with this nonsense. 72.142.92.204 (talk) 10:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Buck Martinez. Materialscientist (talk) 11:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a bot? 72.142.92.204 (talk) 11:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.