User talk:Aellithy
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Aellithy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! bobrayner (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Aellithy, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]
|
Hi Aellithy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
September 2013[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cost basis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [ar:أساس التكلفة]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Arabic language Wikipedia[edit]
Please don't add links to the Arabic language Wikipedia. Most of the links you added were already on Wikidata (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page). If the link is not on Wikidata then please add them there rather than here. I have reverted all the links you added. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- You keep doing this, please stop. I have reverted one and added it to Wikidata. Please familiarize yourself with these proceudres, interwikilinks should not be used any more. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 12:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Aellithy, thanks :-) for your interest in those links. I'll check back here once i learn how to comply with using the new facility, and i'll be sure that all the links you added on en:WP have been reflected (by someone, whoever it may be) on WikiData. In the particular case of the accompanying article Treating, the en:WP version was changed (by another editor, and before your edit) from a proper single-topic article to something that should never occur -- namely a page combining the Disambiguation function with content appropriate to cover the topics of two separate en:WP articles. I'll be breaking off from Treating the coverage of both topics, splitting them to create Treating (law) and Treating (sociology), and i'll turn Treating into a Disambiguation page that links to both of them. I "took my heart in my hands" (since all i know of written works in the Arabic language is "read from right to left"!) and was pleased to find that you'd referred to your English-language sources by including English titles. (Of course you did, just as i would where sources in other languages are involved!) I didn't really guess that you'd stick to the over-wide scope of our article, but that means to me that it is the Dab i'm creating that should inherit the link to the Arabic WP. What you translated may, for all i know, be acceptable at the ar:WP, and i'll leave it to you and other editors there to establish any further en-to-ar interlanguage links that seem appropriate, if you-all similarly decide to split the social and the political concepts into separate articles.
--Jerzy•t 06:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Aellithy, thanks :-) for your interest in those links. I'll check back here once i learn how to comply with using the new facility, and i'll be sure that all the links you added on en:WP have been reflected (by someone, whoever it may be) on WikiData. In the particular case of the accompanying article Treating, the en:WP version was changed (by another editor, and before your edit) from a proper single-topic article to something that should never occur -- namely a page combining the Disambiguation function with content appropriate to cover the topics of two separate en:WP articles. I'll be breaking off from Treating the coverage of both topics, splitting them to create Treating (law) and Treating (sociology), and i'll turn Treating into a Disambiguation page that links to both of them. I "took my heart in my hands" (since all i know of written works in the Arabic language is "read from right to left"!) and was pleased to find that you'd referred to your English-language sources by including English titles. (Of course you did, just as i would where sources in other languages are involved!) I didn't really guess that you'd stick to the over-wide scope of our article, but that means to me that it is the Dab i'm creating that should inherit the link to the Arabic WP. What you translated may, for all i know, be acceptable at the ar:WP, and i'll leave it to you and other editors there to establish any further en-to-ar interlanguage links that seem appropriate, if you-all similarly decide to split the social and the political concepts into separate articles.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)