User talk:C.McGaw

Welcome![edit]

Hello, C.McGaw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

Hello C.McGaw,

let me introduce myself, Graeme Bartlett as an on-line ambassador to your Wikipedia work. I am here to help you with the Wikipedia technical and social world. You can ask me questions or chat to me on my talk page at User talk:Graeme Bartlett, or you can email me by using this page: Special:EmailUser/Graeme Bartlett. I will be looking at your work on Wikipedia to see what I can suggest to you. Once your page goes live I will see if I can nominate it for the WP:Did you know to get it listed on the front page. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:51, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Austin[edit]

The intro could be strengthened more. Here you can specify as to why the Oklahoma Aulacogen is a significant geological features. Could also mention its economic significance(just a mention...later in the significance part you could add in some detail.

Description: You could describe an Aulacogen elsewhere or link it. Here it disrupts the flow of this section going form Aulacogens in general to the Oklahoma Aulacogen.

Tectonic Evolution: Looking good. Could smooth it out and strengthen it more. Check out AAPG Memoirs 51 Interior Cratonic Basins. In this book, there will be some info as to generally set up the initiation of these failed rift structures throughout North America in the Cambrian - PC.

Significance: Add in detail about the amount of oil / gas recovered and what were some major break through in this basin for exploration? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajamesm28 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Matt[edit]

The intro, is a little short, and I feel that you may benefit from moving the lower description to the beginning intro. Aulacogen is a funny word, a speech pronunciation box would be a great addition, I was just hung up on thinking about the word the entire read. The hyper link last words in the last sentence, "..and Hardeman Basin." are broken, or the page does not exist for it.

Statistics about the region - area's size, length and width, volume of rock, etc. - are welcoming and easily understood; they'll look great in a high-school science paper. To add to that, maybe ages in the parentheses next to the geologic ages you listed will keep readers on your page and in the flow of reading.

Another thing that would really enhance conveying the history to readers would be pictures. You have a solid picture of the region you're studying, but you could include some helpers like a scale bar and North arrow to guide our international readers. The two other pictures I see are in development, nice. If you're not working on one at the moment, I think a step by step evolution of the development of the failed rift would go a long way.

The References area a little funky, but so are mine (lemme know if you figure the problem out).

Overall seems like you got a good handle of the topic and I'm looking forward to your diagrams. I guess closing advice would be to follow K.I.S.S..

Don's Edits[edit]

Intro[edit]

Intro is a bit on the small side, Borrow info from the description to beef it up. You may want to use an infobox like the one I have (nuvvuagittuq greenstone belt). It is a really nice touch and looks clean.

description[edit]

You use arms a lot, ultimately becomes confusing for the reader. Probably ought to include some kind of map of the Lapetus ocean, you could even use their map!

tectonic evolution[edit]

I like the image, but make it bigger!

mafic and felsic rocks[edit]

I would love to see a petrographic map of the mountains, or even a subset. I know those are hard to get public domain, but see what you can do!

general[edit]

The content is great, but it is a big wall of text, break it up a bit to make it less aesthetically intimidating

Drhood2938 (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Hello, C.McGaw. Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated for Did you know consideration to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 05:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Geologicmap.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Geologicmap.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Hello, C.McGaw. Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated for Did you know consideration to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 05:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen[edit]

On 3 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen contains over 250,000 km³ (60,000 cu mi) of igneous rock, including a multitude of gabbros? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year C.McGaw![edit]

Happy New Year!

C.McGaw,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.