User talk:Chappy84/Archive 5

Archives

1. 5th September 2006 - 18th November 2006

2. 19th November 2006 - 19th June 2007

3. 19th June 2007 - 2nd September 2007

4. 6th September 2007 - 9th December 2007

5. 19th December 2007 - 19th March 2008

6. 8th April 2008 - 4th January 2009

7. 4th February 2009 - 9th January 2015

8. 4th February 2015 - 17th March 2022

9. Current

Leeds United

I reverted your edits because, you had no reason to revert them. It is OK to have a colar and trim added if its actually on the shirt (see, Template:Football kit), we're just not supposed to have sponsors... take a look at England national football team. The improvals are correct, using this and this for a guide.

Same goes for the reverts you made on the shade colours in templates. United's blue is more of a navy, than a standard blue that say Chelsea use. Look at the colours used on the official site layout and the shirts above, I put the shirts in photoshot and found the exact colour shade for them. - Yorkshirian (talk) 23:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Heartbeats

Here, instead of just undoing the last change I made, why did you also undo the capitalisation change which I made correctly in line with the Manual of Style and the spacing fix from the info box? Also, I'm not sure why you've reinserted the Scrubs reference. You say in your edit comment that the Sony ad was significant although the Scrubs use wasn't. I agree completely and whole heartedly. That's why I left the Sony ref there and removed the irrelevant Scrubs ref. But again, you undid that change. I'm confused... 81.159.254.193 (talk) 07:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Leeds United Kit

Could you help to make the kit shown on the main Leeds United page and the current season page more accurate replicas of our actual kit? The home kit on the main page is fine apart from the sides, which are accurate on the home kit on the current season page and the away kit on the current season page is fine apart from the sides, which are accurate on the main page. Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 19:43, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Faithless I Want More-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Faithless I Want More-2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Faithless I Want More-3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Faithless I Want More-3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Leeds seasons

Hi, it's the season in the Midland League that's the problem with the 88/87 years, not the change to Prem. The club only had 88 years of existence before they went down to League One, one of which (the first) was in the Midland League and therefore not in the top two divisions.

Admitted to top two divisions in 1920/1 ... up to the end of 1926/7 is 7 seasons, another 80 takes it up to the end of 2006/7, which is a total of 87 years in the top two divisions before they went down.

It'd probably read better if the sentence about Elland Road was moved out of the way, so it could read something like were elected to the Football League for the 1920–21 season. Their next 87 years were spent in the top two divisions ...

hope this makes it clearer. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

I've shuffled it a bit, hope it reads OK now. You were quite right about the Prem/FL thing, that was me being careless. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Leeds United Template

I suppose the Service Crew and Square Ball aren't officialy affiliated to the club, but Yorkshire Radio certainly is, since it is owned by Leeds United A.F.C., provides commentary on every single first team game, broadcasts live video coverage of all reserve team matches and follows the club off the field too. Perhaps this is a better version:

Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 13:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, my bad. It was the inaccurate info on the Yorkshire Radio article that led me to believe that it was officially affiliated to the club. I think the alteration you suggested is this:

I personally feel that this looks better, since the Seasons section is charting our past seasons ie. History and the Current Season section looks better with the main sections as it isn't quite so 'left out'.:

Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 17:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

OK. I'm currently in the process of expanding the articles on Elland Road, Leeds City and the Overview section of the club history, so I'll leave the club template as it is until another time. Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 18:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

List of Leeds United A.F.C. players

if all players that have made 100 plus appearances are now included then i would say the article is complete. Maybe though if the founding players (if any) wee to be added it would definetly complete the page SWY (talk) 01:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hoosiers - Trick To Life (Alternative Covers).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hoosiers - Trick To Life (Alternative Covers).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Current season

Hi there, I was just wondering whether the squad information seciton is supposed to include all appearances and goals rather than simply league ones, as most articles do.
Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 20:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Leeds seasons

Just leatting you know. I'm hoping to nominate this as a FL again soon. But first I want to sort out this issue with the current season. I've left a note on the WikiProject Football‎ talk page if you want to have your say. Buc (talk) 20:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Current season has been removed due to this being the main consensus. As a result I don't plan to nominate it as a FL. Buc (talk) 23:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey Chappy, we're driving on with the FLC, so the seasons article is back at peer review. Someone has asked for a citation for the attendances figure. I seem to recall you did a lot of good work getting the table expanded to include this information, can you provide us with a reference for the attendances figures? Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 15:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

After a great PR I decided to take the plunge and go for it so all comments and support (or otherwise!) are welcome at Leeds seasons FLC. Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 22:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PetShopBoysBackToMine.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PetShopBoysBackToMine.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Template help request

Hello. I notice you've helped out with Template:Fc. I was wondering if you could tell me what I've done wrong with Template:Nct, which I've attempted to from adapt from the football club template to work for national cricket teams.

Currently when I use it creates a quote esque area of formatting (see the Qualifying section of this version of ICC World Twenty20.

Any help you can offer would be much appreciated. Earl CG (talk) 15:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Kubb.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kubb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Gary McAllister

Hi Chappy84, I've reverted your edits to Leeds United A.F.C. and Leeds United A.F.C. managers where you added Macca as the new manager as the cite you provided only says that Leeds are "set" to announce. He shouldn't really be added until there is a verifiable source. I'm sure he's going to be announced but it's best to not jump the gun. --JD554 (talk) 16:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Question

why did you change the citations for Sheehan and Kenton? they don't have to be impartial, just reliable Skitzo (talk) 19:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Vib_Gyor_Band.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Vib_Gyor_Band.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Kubb.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Kubb.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 09:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Ellandrd.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ellandrd.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 09:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Roses rivalry

Thanks for the message, much appreciated. Feel free to add anything which you feel will improve the article. It might actually pass a GA review. - Yorkshirian (talk) 08:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Leeds United Honours

Your reason for removing the honour I added was "these are the honours as listed on official site", but it is listed here on the official site, along with others that aren't on the wikipedia list. Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 00:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Libertinesbestofsleeve.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Libertinesbestofsleeve.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vib Gyor EP2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vib Gyor EP2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vib Gyor EP3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vib Gyor EP3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vib Gyor EP4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vib Gyor EP4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:38193116 leedshaaalkeane300.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:38193116 leedshaaalkeane300.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HalifaxTownAFC.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:HalifaxTownAFC.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Folk Face

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Folk Face, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Folk Face seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Folk Face, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Belle Vue3.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Belle Vue3.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VegitaU (talk) 00:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Belle Vue 3.jpg

You're certainly correct - I can't believe I missed that one. I've restored the image, put it back in its article, and placed a marker on it to prevent future deletions. Happy editing! east.718 at 06:04, March 17, 2008

Speedy deletion of Image:Belle Vue3.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Belle Vue3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Belle Vue3.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VegitaU (talk) 04:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Belle Vue3.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Belle Vue3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. VegitaU (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)