User talk:Fabriziomacagno

Welcome!

A cup of warm tea to welcome you!

Hello, Fabriziomacagno, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to do lots more. Some useful pages to visit are:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:54, 28 April 2015 (UTC).

April 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Doug Walton has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Doug Walton was changed by Fabriziomacagno (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923479 on 2015-04-28T20:37:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't know that I'd call your edits to Doug Walton vandalism exactly, but they were overly eager. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a text book. While it is good to have an article that describes Walton's theory in a basic summary fashion, we do not need an entire course on the subject. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:42, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Argument has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Argument was changed by Fabriziomacagno (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885362 on 2015-05-30T06:59:33+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:59, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Fabriziomacagno. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Argument, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 09:13, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

^ The above is a template message I posted in response to these edits of yours, where you seem to have referenced your own work. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 09:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Argumentation scheme (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Argumentation scheme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Argumentation scheme, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:49, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Argumentation scheme has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Argumentation scheme. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 01:53, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Argumentation scheme (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Argumentation scheme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Argumentation scheme, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:07, 20 November 2019 (UTC)