User talk:Frayae/Safn 4

Appreciation and apology

After giving it some thought, I want to tell you that I appreciate your procedural consideration at the Talk:Rice–Eccles Stadium § Requested move 7 July 2018 (permanent link) discussion. Additionally, I am sorry if my tone seemed at all critical of your decision or suggested that I interpreted your actions as indicating opposition. Your note at the discussion suggested to me that it might have been taken that way, so it is important to me that I clarify that, since it was not my intent and I don't want you to feel at all criticized for competently handling such situations. Regarding the latter, thank you for that. In the future, I will be more explicit about whether my response is directed at someone or, like it was in this case, intended to express general support. —Nøkkenbuer (talk • contribs) 16:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk regarding page Yash Paul Sharma

Hi Dear, I have provided the suitable references. Make go through it and let me know if anything needs to be edit. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yash raina (talk • contribs) 10:18, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to participate in the deletion discussion which is now being held regarding the article. Other editors have raised notability concerns. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luka Jagačić (August 8)

Noted. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notable since he played 31 games in the 1.HNL so passes WP:NFOOTY due to playing in a fully professional league - but there needs to be inline citations/more sources before this article can be accepted. Fix this and resubmit and I'll accept it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luka Jagačić and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Luka Jagačić, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer talk 12:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Frayae! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SportingFlyer talk 12:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

Sidhu Moose Wala

I have been attempting to deal with the article Sidhu Moose Wala after discussing it here. I draftified it but the creator, Preetzaildar8, did not follow the instructions and returned it to mainspace. I draftified it again and gave him a warning but he ignored what I said. I was just about to report him to AnI when I saw you had taken over dealing with the article. I was not best pleased, but at least it means I can get on with doing something more useful. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: I did see your actions in the page log but not the more extensive discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol. I don't think AfC can satisfactorily deal with this article since it is borderline acceptable and the creator is unresponsive, so it will almost certainly end up moved back until the creator is blocked. Sending it to AfD would be my prefered option and I will do so that once I have done a Google search for sources. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have improved the article greatly by removing a lot of the unreferenced material. I have put the article on my watchlist and will see how things develop. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:34, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luka Jagačić has been accepted

Luka Jagačić, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SportingFlyer talk 00:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Women in Iceland at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Matthys Gerhardus Smith

Hi Frayae, Thanks for your comment. He is one of the widely known youth writers in South Africa, with even more books published than on the page. The fact that he wrote it in the 4oties and 50ties and that its still read today respectfully make him notable. Films and TV series has been done from his books. Kindly reconsider. Barry Ne (talk) 17:19, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Barry Ne. I think that the article is acceptable, but if you ever find any more references for the subject then do add them. Right now there are no references which indicate the subjects notability and prolific writers are not presumed to be notable. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Barry Ne (talk) 02:39, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sephora

Regarding Sephora UAE and KSA - I was told a subsidiary wasn't notable. I can accept that. It was suggested I merge the pages, which I did carefully making sure it was appropriately sectioned under subheadings. And now, it's removed again. There is value in this information - the companies middle eastern strategy and history is interesting. Please can you see fit to allow my edit so I can stop going round in circles. I should also like to add that NBC Universal Japan is a subsidiary of Universal studios - but somehow that and all the other Universal subsidiary's have their own Wiki articles. I think Sephora UAE and KSA should be allowed to remain. Thank you Rjwmccaffrey (talk) 16:14, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the content to Sephora. There is no substantial problem with the content you merged and I welcome any further improvements you have for the article. Regarding your second point, Universal Studios Japan is a large theme park rather than just a subsidiary company. I can't see an obvious comparison. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:29, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Massive ongoing page-move vandalism. — MRD2014 ^Talk 00:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Open Data Kit

Removed the speedy deletion tag for the Open Source Software Open Data Kit. see talk page - hope that is OK for you. --Bert Niehaus (talk) 13:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From Talk:Open Data Kit.

This page was suggested for speedy deletion. It is Open Source Software used for humanitarian purpose.
The GRASS GIS is a Geo Information System that is allowed in Wikipedia??? Open Data Kit not Company and not a software.

The tagging of the first release with db-corp|help=off does not make sense.

. ODK should treated as any other Open Source Software - like GRASS GIS, like R Statistics Software.

GitHub Repository was added.
--Bert Niehaus (talk) 12:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@Bert Niehaus: From the article at the time I tagged it. I saw the first sentence was The Open Data Kit (ODK) community produces free and open-source software and this suggested to me that it was an organisation. Db-corp covers organisations. Although you should not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, I won't be putting it back. There is no certainty the article won't be deleted later since I don't see any clear indication of notability. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]