User talk:Iceage 101

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Iceage 101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. TuskDeer (talk) 21:15, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Spitz has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Spitz was changed by Iceage 101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924491 on 2020-09-12T13:34:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of French breeds[edit]

Hello, Iceage 101,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged List of French breeds for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 20:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Poodle has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Poodle was changed by Iceage 101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899274 on 2020-09-16T19:27:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yorkshire Terrier. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 19:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Yorkshire Terrier, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 20:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 20:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Yorkshire Terrier has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Yorkshire Terrier was changed by Iceage 101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871355 on 2020-10-12T16:03:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yorkshire Terrier. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 16:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Keeshond.
You have removed properly cited text and replaced it with your own view. Please be aware that this is a Level-4 warning - you will get no more. William Harris (talk) 07:26, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The real intelligence of dogs[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, The real intelligence of dogs, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. OliverEastwood talk 21:55, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t delete this, it’s my first work Iceage 101 (talk) 21:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iceage 101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just want to help

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 19:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why I need to get unbanned[edit]

The reason why I need to be unbanned is that I can make articles on Wikipedia easier to read with Grammarly, and please, just let me use the talk page on wikipedia, and let me share my ideas on my talk page.

That is why I want to be unbanned on Wikipedia

Unless you can demonstrate that you understand the reason for your block, it won't be lifted. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 20:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Iceage 101, to be unblocked you'll need to make a clear and coherent request that addresses the points in the yellow-beige template immediately above this section. You'll need to show understanding of why you were blocked, explain how you will avoid repeating those mistakes, and give us an idea of what useful edits you might make to the project. If you can't or won't do that, you will stay blocked. You aren't banned, just blocked for now – indefinite does not mean for ever. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How I will work on Wikipedia next time[edit]

Next time, I will only use the talk page, edit with Grammarly, and help with Persian and French Wikipedia. That is how I will go next time

How I will get unbanned[edit]

What i did before I got blocked: I vandalized many pages, and made many sock puppet accounts to prevent being blocked. I also edited the Affenpinscher, afghan hound and bulldog pages with my own words, as well as making my own page called the real intelligence of dogs.

What I will do next time: Next time, I will ask in the talk page, and have people undo what I have done. I will only get ten chances, and I will get more chances each time I dont edit anything for one week

Ha, NO, you don't get ten chances. We're not playing around here. I looked over your edits, and I am about to see about those other accounts. This here is indicative enough for the NOTHERE block, though I cannot speak for User:Justlettersandnumbers: you do not leave proper edit summaries and are thus not communicative (a must for a collaborative project), your command of written English is poor, you remove relevant and important references, you removed useful templates--I could go on. So it's a combination of incompetence and disruption.
Also, you're not banned, you're blocked. See WP:BANBLOCKDIFF. That's not a huge thing (though it's an important difference), but one would think that if you come to play on someone else's website, you'd want to know the rules. Right? You don't walk into someone's house and piss on the rug just because that's what you do at home... Drmies (talk) 23:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I don't know if I found all of them, but what I found I blocked and revoked talk page access. It's pretty sad, and I have better things to do than to spend my time explaining how Wikipedia works, how trust works, how to write proper English, all of that. So I will point you to WP:OFFER--you have enough sock accounts to make my pointing at this the best way forward. Good luck. Drmies (talk) 23:56, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does this mean I will get unblocked[edit]

I don’t get what you mean

Then the answer is no. Drmies (talk) 02:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do?[edit]

Tell me what I did in short form

Are you guys angry at me?[edit]

I would like to know how you feel about me

December 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]