User talk:Jared Hunt

Hello Jared Hunt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing!  ♥ Kylu  (talk • contribs • email • logs • count) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Hope you find yourself comfortable here, Jared! If you have any questions, feel free to ask. :)

~Kylu (u|t) 05:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Mirrors and Forks

I really do care (and have spent a great deal of time and energy on the project), but I am also on a de facto wikibreak (not permanent), and if/when I return to active editing I will not begin with MF; it stresses me too much. Superm401 - Talk 03:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Nathaniel Hawthorne

I would like to register my objection to your revert of part of my Hawthorne edit. The reason I put his full name in bold is to emphasize that his birth name is different from the name we are familiar with. If you want, I could put (born Nathaniel Hathorne) in the first paragraph of the article, but I do think this information should be readily and unambiguously available–currently one can only glean it by reading through the second paragraph, but it's standard practice to put birth names in bold. Biruitorul 23:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Perfect; thanks. Biruitorul 13:07, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the nice comment. :) --TBCTaLk?!? 01:29, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

thanks!

You're very welcome; I hope that I see the page through to completion. Tony 16:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

My name

It doesn't mean anything in particular. When I first started using the internet on a regular basis 6-7 years ago, I started using my real name. For various reasons that turned out not to be the best of ideas so I turned to using an old school nickname. It didn't take long before when signing up to new sites I found the name already taken so I had to either come up with a new name or try modifying it slightly. --pgk^(talk) 09:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Teke's RfA thanks

Thank you for your support of my RfA, which has passed with a final tally of 76/1/1. With this overwhelming show of support and approval I am honored to serve Wikipedia in the task charged to me and as outlined in my nomination. Happy editing to you! Teke ^(talk) 17:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Skub?

It's a reference to this webcomic strip; see also The Perry Bible Fellowship. Hope that clears it up for you; good day and happy editing! --Merovingian - Talk 12:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

No problem.  :) --Merovingian - Talk 12:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Footnote problem

The issue has been around since at least 19:20 (UTC) yesterday. I just posted a summary at WP:ANI hoping someone with the power will do something about it. Gimmetrow 14:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Weapon dance

Thanks for helping--especially with reference formatting--on the Weapon dance article I've just started. Cheers from Naples, Italy! Jeffmatt 15:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Weapon dance, again

I now see that there is redundancy between the references and notes; that is, the compete reference, including page numbers, appears in both places. I suppose that isn't necessarily a bad idea--I'm just wondering which is right. I think the way we have it on our Music of Italy article is: name of book, journal, etc. in the refs and page number and miscellaneous notes and comments in the notes. I'll look for the ISSN numbers on the journals. Thank you for reminding me. Jeffmatt 16:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

(About 6 seconds later) I see that you have put everything in notes. That's fine, too, I guess. Oops, no --wait a minuite. You deleted the refs subtitle. I think that must have been unintentional. Jeffmatt 16:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

and again

Oh, Format-Meister! I obviously am not very good with those bibliographic templates. The first note in Weapon dance now reads as number 6. It links correctly, as do all the others, but it should be number 1. Sorry. Jeffmatt 09:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

That seems to have fixed itself, or maybe you worked your unugly magic! Thanks for the reply on my page. I read the ref you linked. It makes sense, though I was more or less following the lead of a wiki administrator who is working the Music of Italy article with me. I suggest--for further discussion (if necessary)--we use the discussion page of the Weapon dance article, itself. That way, I won't clutter up your page. Jeffmatt 09:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

again, again

I don't know what to do with the previous references. I see now that a new reference--Kurath--while it goes to a note correctly, it doesn't crop in the references. Maybe that's because there is another ref by the same person. Actually three by that name, one is in the list of references; the other two are from the same work (a different one by the same auther). I suppose that every work in the notes--except URLs--should be in the references. Actually, it seems to me that the pages numbers should be in the notes and not in the references. Hmmmmm. I guess it'll work out. Right now, I'm having trouble adding a section on South America. It shows up in the edit space but doesn't appear in the article. Maybe that will fix itself, as is sometime the case. Thanks for all your help. Jeffmatt 07:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I fixed it good this time! I made it Kurath (with one ref) and Kurath2 (with 2) . They now point to the right refs. There is still some text in the edit section right above "footnotes" that is supposed to be a new last section called "South America". It is one paragraph starting "In Brazil..." It shows there but doesn't save in the article.

I think the footnotes should contain the entire references...IBSN, pp. numbers ,etc. etc. and the reference section should be just a list of the names of the books and journals. That way, you get around that cramped-looking repetition of the same information Jeffmatt 09:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I fixed the paragraph that wouldn't save. I forgot the double angle bracket in the mark-up to close the ref above that section. Ol' eagle-eye, that's me! Jeffmatt 10:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

more on references in Weapon dance

It is interesting to compare Weapon dance and Music of Italy. The reference section in weapon dance is totally redudant and, as you say, could be eliminated since all of the information is contained in the notes section (which could then be called "footnotes and references". (Actually, the references are not complete since they don't update themselves automatically from the bibliographic templates.) The alternative in Music of Italy is to have a notes section that contains true notes (that is, comments about the text) and for, straight references, only the author's name that then references an item in the alphabetized list of references. This only works if the bibliographic templates are loaded in the "reference" section and not between ref mark-ups in the editable text. I think that your idea of getting rid of the reference section in "weapon dance" is probably the easiest thing to do since the alternative entails moving all the templates into the reference section and replacing them in the text with a simple one-word author-name reference mark-up. I have said all that after going blind looking at Wikipedia:Citing_sources/example_style. There is no consensus. Jeffmatt 11:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

OK. I think I'll go ahead and delete the References section in {{Weapon dance]]. It is, as you say, much easier to maintain and I can't think of a good reason to have an alphabetical, redundant list of books.Jeffmatt 12:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Music of Italy

Re Featured article status. I just started Weapon dance a few days ago. It isn't nearly ready for bathroom reading, much less featured article. As for Music of Italy, TUF-KAT and I have been banging that out for 6 months and I think he is happy with the referencing system. Please don't touch it without contacting him. That system, by the way, IS as easy to maintain as yours, provided one starts it that way. That is, bibliographic templates in the reference section. That leaves the notes very uncluttered looking--except for real notes--and gives you the advantage of being to say in a note something like "See Smith (1995) for another point of view" or something like that--at which point, the reader looks at the list of books. I have a few notes like that in the Music article. Anyway, TUF-KAT now has it in for Peer_review/Music_of_ItalyPeer Review and both of us kind of think that is already feature quality, though perhaps a bit overwritten in parts. Jeffmatt 18:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

JPD's RfA

Thanks, Jared, for your support at my RfA, which finished with a tally of 94/1/0. I hope I live up to the confidence you have shown in me in my activities as an administrator. JPD (talk) 15:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Interesting discussion on references

Hi, again. Re our recent discussion, see the talk behind today's FA at Talk:Belton_House. Cheers, Jeffmatt 14:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:StarTAC 130.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:StarTAC 130.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Static HTML dumps

Copied from WP:VPT:

A new static HTML dump is now in progress. The static HTML dumps, including the one hosted at godseye.com, do link back to the original page without javascript, they do so via the "current revision" tab at the top. Note however that this is not a requirement of the GFDL. The static dumps were designed for the case where the reader has no internet access, thus they contain the necessary attribution and license information within the dump itself. -- Tim Starling 02:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Reversions

Hi there! My apologies for reverting you here - I soon realized that you were fixing up the references, and reverted myself a few seconds after that. I think fixing up the references is great - I haven't seen a better way of doing this on Wikipedia yet, so I guess what you're doing is more than alright. --HappyCamper 02:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Infrared Tree

Please update your vote at: Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Near_Infrared_Tree to indicate which version you prefer. Thanks! -Ravedave ^{(help name my baby)} 17:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Again please update your vote, as discussion is ongoing here: Wikipedia_talk:Featured_picture_candidates#Near_Infrared_Tree_votes -Ravedave ^{(help name my baby)} 02:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Cite press release

Regarding your request at Template talk:Cite press release#Language, I've added the language option, as well as the quote option. I just saw the request, sorry if this is too late for your purposes. — coelacan talk — 22:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:StarTAC 130.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:StarTAC 130.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 01:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Amish school shooting

An article that you have been involved in editing, Amish school shooting, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amish school shooting. Thank you. A. B. ^(talk) 22:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Please confirm your membership

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:49, 22 December 2010 (UTC).

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)