User talk:Jeppiz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Jeppiz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! bodnotbod (talk) 16:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Moose may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |title=Factsheet: Eurasian Elk (Elk, reindeer, roe deer (Cetartiodactyla Cervidae Capreolinae) > Alces alces) |publisher=Lhnet.org |accessdate=2013-06-27}}</ref>
  • |title=Älgfilm friade Ingemar från mordanklagelser |publisher=Expressen |accessdate=2014-11-01}}</ref> In the Americas, moose injure more people than any other wild mammal and, worldwide, only

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

My talk page[edit]

Jeppiz,

I responded to your notes on my talk page.

Regards, --Blue Indigo (talk) 23:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Israeli election[edit]

Hello Jeppiz. Just to let you know, I have moved the Israeli election article back. The dissolution bill still needs to go through two more readings, and the date (whilst agreed by everyone) has not yet been formally voted on. The second and third readings of the bill are on Monday, so it is likely to be confirmed then. Cheers, Number 57 22:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Sure, good idea so let's wait for the definite decision. Cheers Jeppiz (talk) 13:04, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Historicity of Jesus arbitration case - proposed decision posted[edit]

This is a courtesy message to inform you that the proposed decision has been posted for the Historicity of Jesus arbitration case. Constructive, relevant comments are welcome on the proposed decision talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 03:41, 25 December 2014 (UTC) Message delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk).

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historicity of Jesus closed[edit]

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

6) Fearofreprisal (talk · contribs) is warned to not engage in personal attacks or cast aspersions of bias and intent against other editors.

7) The Arbitration Committee endorses the community-imposed topic ban preventing Fearofreprisal (talk · contribs) from editing Historicity of Jesus.[1] It is converted to an Arbitration Committee-imposed ban affecting the Historicity of Jesus, broadly construed, and enforcement of the ban should be discussed at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Fearofreprisal is cautioned that if they disrupt and breach restrictions, they may be subject to increasingly severe sanctions. They may appeal this ban to the Committee in no less than twelve months time.

For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC) (Message delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk))

Please see the CMT talk section.[edit]

Renejs (talk) 00:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Since you are an editor who reverted the update of Grant, please see the CMT talk discussion.Renejs (talk) 00:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

thanks[edit]

Please don't feel badly or think you took a harsh tone! I am used to a lot worse here on wikipedia, from stubborn users who will not listen to others' opinions/ideas and revert edits without good reason. Thank you for being civil and I appreciate your feedback! --user:Neddy1234

International law re: Golan Heights[edit]

If you were actually going by international law, then you wouldn't have undone my revision. Although I expect nothing less from editors who have agendas here.124.180.140.187 (talk) 19:05, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Socks reverting your edits[edit]

Have you seen Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/O.Turani/Archive, which records previous investigations of his/her use of sock puppets.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:49, 10 January 2015 (UTC)