User talk:Jmaxfield18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jmaxfield18, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Jmaxfield18! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Jmaxfield18, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Jmaxfield18, good luck, and have fun. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 02:47, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmaxfield18. GREAT WORK! Keep improving this page.

I just want to advise you to stop using these two sources:

They are too closely associated with the movement and should be considered Primary Sources. Instead, use them as a guide and search for Secondary Sources (which are considered more reliable on Wikipedia). Also, you only need maybe one or two sources per city. Pick the best and forget the rest. Cheers.

--- Coffeeandcrumbs 02:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MOS[edit]

Please edit per the MOS, specifically the United States section. Your most recent edit has been reverted. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 00:39, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Families Belong Together, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Barre, Vermont, Rutland, Vermont and Greg Fisher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jmaxfield18. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of 2019 Women's March locations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Falmouth, Lowell, Lewis, New York and Ayer

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
I admit, I was initially concerned about List of 2019 Women's March locations, but you've shown dedication to improving this list. Thanks for all your time and energy on this article and others, and keep up the great work! Happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 21:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop the Bans[edit]

I've created a stub for Stop the Bans, if you're interested. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:24, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just putting 2021 anti-Asian violence rallies on your radar, in case you're interested in listing demonstrations. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of March for Our Lives locations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Jackson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of March for Our Lives locations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Elizabeth Patterson, Jose Rodriguez and Michael Bennett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Template:Protests against Trump footer. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of 2020 Women's March locations (October), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noah!💬 16:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@NoahDavid771: this was an unfortunate creation. This series of articles relies heavily on self-published social media sources, which are not reliable to support the assertions in the article. Now we'll need to remove hundreds of those in each article. I hope you can assist with the cleanup. Elizium23 (talk) 04:48, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2017 Women's March locations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2017 Women's March locations outside United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Todos Santos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2017 Women's March locations outside United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puducherry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Women's March[edit]

Sharing in case you're interested: 2021 Women's March. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2021 Women's March locations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whitehall, Pennsylvania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2022 Women's March locations (May 14), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aaron Ford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of March for Our Lives locations (2022), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 12:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay... I built this page in the same manner as List of 2022 Women's March locations, which (so far) is past draft stage. Planned Parenthood and March for Our Lives both put up respective maps of event locations, with tentative details per event page. I always keep records of these event pages, with exact tags; certain types of event pages (e.g. Facebook) still remain with details on display after the event has happened, while others lose their information; all the same, putting links to these pages on Wikipedia is half the effort, be it before, during or after the day of action. There are also public spreadsheets with crowd estimates and various sources to back up reported tallies after events have taken place. It should come as no surprise that half of them are tweets, not just from average citizens but also elected officials and political candidates for office, with personal photo and video documentation to boot. Any information from primary sources should be about planning only. As crowd sizes in various cities tend to diminish in comparison with previous years, I believe most reported (and often countable) tallies as given and corroborated by various sources should be taken with a grain of salt. Can you further define the scope of "reliable, independent sources?" Jmaxfield18 (talk) 16:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This looks like quite a lot of effort, thank you for the article!
Not scope creep, but I assume the issue was in fact with the significant number of tweets, regardless of whether they're by political figures or not. If something can't be sourced other than by a tweet, it should be removed. See WP:TWEET for the relevant policy. Rusalkii (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmaxfield18, I would give you a final warning about self-published sources. You cannot use Tweets, or other social media, by participants or non-journalists. You cannot use them to support facts about attendance at events, or to support claims about third parties. You cannot use self-published sources when they are unduly self-serving. Please see WP:SPS and WP:BLPSPS. Elizium23 (talk) 04:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of 2022 Dobbs ruling protest locations (June 24), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more content and citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Star Mississippi 03:02, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: It's considered good practice to put ref names in quotes, and to have ref names that help other editors identify the reference. To minimize collisions, it's often a good idea to use the publication date as part of the ref name, but it turns out not to be so helpful in this article, where most of the dates are 2022-06-24. First or last names could collide as more references are added, so name of publication is probably better than first or last name. I got as far as Indiana before I gave up. You don't have to complete the "task" of improving ref names. —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC) Jmaxfield18 (talk) 20:12, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of 2022 Dobbs ruling protest locations (June 24), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of 2022 Dobbs ruling protest locations (June 24) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:List of 2022 Dobbs ruling protest locations (June 24) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 04:33, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's noticeboard[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 18:44, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Elizium23 (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]