User talk:Loly12345

Loly12345, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Loly12345! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Copts, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 15:17, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Copts with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:29, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Copts. ... discospinster _talk 15:33, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your multiple edits to the Copts and Religion in Egypt articles. You are wasting both your own and other editors time by deleting detail that had supporting references. That type of editing is considered to be vandalism and will always be reverted on sight by any editor. If you continue to edit in this way your editing access will be blocked. Richard Harvey (talk) 08:08, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:46, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 16:04, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]