User talk:Lukeyhano

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Lukeyhano, and welcome to Wikipedia. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. -Fnlayson (talk) 00:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Human rights in Ukraine has been reverted.
Your edit here to Human rights in Ukraine was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McVtNOmkb2g) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:25, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bob Margolis[edit]

Hello, Lukeyhano. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Bob Margolis, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Bob Margolis to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 02:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to November 13, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 20:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Algebra Nation concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Algebra Nation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Algebra Nation[edit]

Hello, Lukeyhano. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Algebra Nation".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, you may be blocked from editing. Esrever ^(klaT) 22:19, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 09:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Verizon Communications ‎. Kuru (talk) 18:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}.

Kuru (talk) 18:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Please remember to use edit summaries when making edits, especially on an article that many people are editing at the same time. GMG ^talk 21:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bob Margolis[edit]

The article Bob Margolis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unambiguous WP:NPOL fail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 12:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. _signed,Willondon (talk) 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know how you justify those edits, especially given the source. At the moment I am wondering if I should simply block you. I will also note that your removal of Jewish sources on the basis of religion is not justified. Doug Weller talk 19:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topic alert for all pages related to the Arab-Israeli conflict[edit]

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours per page for pages within this topic. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Doug Weller talk 18:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning[edit]

systematic removal of reliable sources published by Jewish organizations is a serious offense. It demonstrates bias on the part of the editor and if repeated will result in blocking. Rjensen (talk) 19:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's resulting in an indefinite block right now, per all the unacceptable edits made on 11 May. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 21:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Lukeyhano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Valid edits to the Wikipedia articles were made, and the validity and reputability of the sources are questionable, which many compromise the article's neutrality. It is unfair and biased to allow the original editor's contributions who included the article, but then argue that I am biased when I make an argument for the removal of the sources and claims based on the sources. It is unfair to claim antisemitism when the literature is being questioned, not a specific group by nature.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Valid edits to the Wikipedia articles were made, and the validity and reputability of the sources are questionable, which many compromise the article's neutrality. It is unfair and biased to allow the original editor's contributions who included the article, but then argue that I am biased when I make an argument for the removal of the sources and claims based on the sources. It is unfair to claim antisemitism when the literature is being questioned, not a specific group by nature. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Valid edits to the Wikipedia articles were made, and the validity and reputability of the sources are questionable, which many compromise the article's neutrality. It is unfair and biased to allow the original editor's contributions who included the article, but then argue that I am biased when I make an argument for the removal of the sources and claims based on the sources. It is unfair to claim antisemitism when the literature is being questioned, not a specific group by nature. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Valid edits to the Wikipedia articles were made, and the validity and reputability of the sources are questionable, which many compromise the article's neutrality. It is unfair and biased to allow the original editor's contributions who included the article, but then argue that I am biased when I make an argument for the removal of the sources and claims based on the sources. It is unfair to claim antisemitism when the literature is being questioned, not a specific group by nature. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Lukeyhano (talk) 01:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]