User talk:Meera Kaul

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Meera Kaul, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Meerakaul, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jinkinson talk to me 05:46, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meerakaul[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meerakaul requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jinkinson talk to me 05:46, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Meerakaul, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Jinkinson talk to me 05:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Meera Kaul (talk) 05:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC) We are just trying to create a wikipedia page bio page for the living person. Please explain what is wrong in this simple page we have created.[reply]

Good question. The answer is that no sources at all are provided in the article as it is. Please read WP:BIO, which clarifies why some people have articles on Wikipedia and others do not. Given the similarity of your username to the title of this article, you might want to read WP:AUTOBIO as well. Jinkinson talk to me 06:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And please don't remove tags yourself, they will be replaced Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meera Kaul (March 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikicology was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meera Kaul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 08:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 08:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

undefined

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question[edit]

Hello, Meera Kaul! I'm Wikiisawesome. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk wia (talk) 21:43, 24 April 2015 (UTC) wia (talk) 21:43, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for shared use of the account, which must be considered compromised. Each person that has access to this account and wants to edit Wikipedia should create an account of their own.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Huon (talk) 22:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]