User talk:Moondragon21/Archives/2023/July

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Tewkesbury Borough Council election has been accepted

2023 Tewkesbury Borough Council election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 16:29, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Jana Seppelt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jana Seppelt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana Seppelt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 07:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2017 Torfaen County Borough Council election has been accepted

2017 Torfaen County Borough Council election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of 2022 West Bank bus crash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 West Bank bus crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 West Bank bus crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BilledMammal (talk) 00:45, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Regressive left for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Regressive left is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regressive left until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Simonm223 (talk) 15:05, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

2023 Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies

Hi there. Thank you for listing the new and abolished constituencies for this article. I was wondering whether you were going to update this list for English constituencies now that the final proposals have been published. (The Scottish and Welsh ones seem to be up-to-date). I am quite happy to do this if you don't have the time. Also, I note that you have linked most of the new constituencies to the County Lists of Parliamentary constituencies, which is a bit strange. Presumably, these will all need to be set up as new pages - see, for example, Fareham and Waterlooville. JSboundaryman (talk) 19:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm not Moon but just to set things out from my perspective. I think for now the redirects are fine. There's no point in creating articles with no results, no candidates, and until things get updated beyond our control, no maps. Let's do things in stages: make sure the Final Recommendations section is accurate; then make sure the county articles are accurate; then think about each individual article. We've got some potential problems afoot that we can leave for now - will the article use "Glyndwr" or"Glyndŵr"; the Commission has recommended "Dover and Deal" but that's a redirect to an article which covers both, so what shall we do; do we use "Ross-shire"? Maybe this is my real life role talking, but let's do things in order and take it from there. doktorb wordsdeeds 22:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your input. I agree about doing things in steps. So, I will get on with updating the lists on the Periodic Review article, then update the county and regional articles. I was thinking to wait until the Reviews have been formally approved by Parliament before creating individual articles for the new constituencies, in readiness for the next general election. We can, at least, specify the boundaries (my speciality). Maps could also be created, but I wouldn't know how to generate these. JSboundaryman (talk) 10:48, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
@Doktorbuk, had a little dispute just now with @Santiago Claudio over "Glyndwr" or"Glyndŵr", I'd argue (for now) based purely on the report to use Glyndŵr for Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr (UK Parliament constituency) as that is used under the dedicated sub-section in the report, Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr (Maldwyn a Glyndŵr) and The Commission recommends the official name of Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr for this constituency and the official alternative name of Maldwyn a Glyndŵr., I assume the other mentions may have not included it as it is not a common key. Most other official uses of Glyndŵr include ŵ, so makes more sense to include it than exclude it, such as Glyndŵr and Wrexham Glyndŵr University until more media information is provided to be analysed for common use.
@Moondragon21, apologies for hijacking your talk page! Not sure where this conversation should be and didn't want to fracture it. DankJae 01:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
I knew this might be the first point of contention. My instinct is that most people won't type the entire name to get to the article, so there's that to consider. Wikipedia is supposed to reflect what sources say, and most sources use the "ŵ". So the main article should too, and we'll create a redirect using the "w" spelling. How's that? doktorb wordsdeeds 10:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
both already exist as redirects DankJae 14:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Aaah! I'd overwrite the "Glyndŵr redirect" as the article and keep the other. For precedent I point to Na h-Eileanan an Iar. doktorb wordsdeeds 14:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Moldovan local elections (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 2023 Moldovan local elections instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A history merge has been requested.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Jana Seppelt. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Moondragon21, you have been editing here a long time, you should know you can't change an article into a redirect that is in the middle of an AFD discussion. Make your argument there, do not take unilateral action on your own as if there wasn't a discussion going on. Liz Read! Talk! 06:24, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Brecon, Radnor and Cwm-tawe (UK Parliament constituency)

@Moondragon21: Request deletion of this redirect as final recommendations were already published. Type db-g7 inside {{}} in the redirect then save. Santiago Claudio (talk) 15:11, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

@Santiago Claudio, should it also include the ones I mentioned above under #Wales revised constituencies? DankJae 18:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
@DankJae: Yes, include the useless ones! Santiago Claudio (talk) 00:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Margaret Chant-Papandreou (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You absolutely cannot write about someone having affairs without providing sources! Also, footnote 3 just says "Ελεύθερος Τύπος" - not even the title of the relevant article or where to find it in the paper.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 07:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello Moondragon21/Archives/2023!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nicolas Bays

Notice

The article Nicolas Bays has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Your Welcome and Thank You For Thanking Me

Title pretty much says it all. Have a nice day! TheTopRocketFan (talk) 10:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moondragon21/Archives/2023/July&oldid=1182320644"