User talk:Prafulo

Welcome!

Hello, Prafulo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Anupam^Talk 00:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit on United Kingdom

Hi, I reverted your recent edit on United Kingdom because it was obviously reflecting your own Point of View (POV) and this is not something Wikipedia encourages; it is meant first and foremost to be an impartial and objective encyclopedia. If you wish to add a point of view comment to a page, make sure you have a suitable reference to back you up (called a citation here) and use language that is more objective. There is further guidance on this at WP:NPOV, all about the "Neutral Point of View" or NPOV that we try to aspire to. If you have further queries, both myself and many other editors will be glad to try to help. Thanks. MarkThomas 22:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

I fully understand, but if you can refer to a controvertial author (refer the page on him, I didnt creat it!!), now can THAT be NPOV?

The claim about contribution, is attributed to this one author, and his is not imparrtial, so why have that paragraph init? I recommend it be removed too, or refered to he HIS view

Please stop

Wikipedia has a policy requiring articles to conform to a neutral point of view. Further, your edits to United Kingdom are in danger of breaking Wikipedia's three-revert rule. Using different accounts does not excuse you from this policy. Please use only one account and make sure that you conform to a neutral tone. BigDT 20:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Prafulo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

70.72.99.148 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Aj2k". The reason given for Aj2k's block is: "3-revert rule".

• Blocking administrator: King of Hearts (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Per below.

I didnt not vandalise, was only reverting what some one else was deleting