User talk:Rolf-Peter Wille

Welcome!

Hello Rolf-Peter Wille, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --MarkSweep (call me collect) 01:55, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suite No. 1 (Rachmaninoff)[edit]

Hello, thank you for the poems on which the suite is based. Do you have the source of this translations? They could maybe better reside on wikisource and be linked to from this non-poetry article. --Dr. Friendly (talk) 16:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dr. Friendly, I found the translations in the International edition. There are quite a number of "prosaic" translations. These are the best. Rolf-Peter Wille (talk) 16:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Braunschweig Classix logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Braunschweig Classix logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidius and Lamey Island Massacre[edit]

Hi Rolf-Peter, thanks for the kind words.

I don't have any conclusive evidence to offer, but I believe it unlikely that Candidius was involved in actually planning the expedition. He was asked to get Taccaran's help, but that was because of his position as someone acquainted with the language and the village. The move to include the Mattauers in the raiding party was a sort of test of their reliability. The order to depopulate the island came from Batavia, and the military authorities in Fort Zeelandia would have been perfectly capable of putting this together without the help of the clergyman. That's not to say he disapproved - his colleague Robert Junius said of the earlier 1633 assault that "we have no doubts at all that it will turn out to be in honour of our God and the salvation of those who will survive this event. At the same time, it will frighten those in the vicinity so that in the future they will not lay their hands so easily again upon those of our nation nor shall they lightly shed any more Christian blood" (The Formosan Encounter Vol I, p. 219). Candidius' opinion was probably of a similar nature.

Taffy (talk) 18:57, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marianne Ny[edit]

The article Marianne Ny has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mhiji (talk) 00:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chopin[edit]

Bonjour Rolf-Peter Wille,

Thank you for undertaking the task of expanding the articles on Chopin's compositions.

Cordialement, --Frania W. (talk) 13:27, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support, dear Frania Wisniewska! Rolf-Peter Wille (talk) 13:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One dares not touch the article after you, only read it. You are doing such a great job !

P.S. Enjoyed reading your poem Ex Nihilo (europoético) with first line "Je danse con mio crocodilo" which reminded me of a piece I once wrote: Waltzing with my car.... FW

--Frania W. (talk) 17:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, RPW

Waltzing with my car is not published, it is not a poem, just an amusing true story dancing in my computer...

Cordialement, FW

File:Tour eiffel feu artifice.jpg

Bonne Année 2011 ! FW

Not really late as the French take the whole month of January to greet in the new year.

--Frania W. (talk) 14:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antilabe for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antilabe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antilabe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 00:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, so antilabe got closed (as expected) as a speedy-keep. Wanted to ask: did you know that the term has an alternative meaning?? The grip of an Ancient Greek aspis is also called an "antilabe"— am not sure myself which term is in more common usage (both are pretty obscure, no?). Do we need a hatnote here, perhaps? Seems premature for a whole DAB page. What do you think? KDS4444^Talk 19:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antilabe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seneca. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You Asked... Is "DPLbot" a "Real" Person??[edit]

Hello,

I got your message a bit ago. You wrote, "wow, that's a very long letter to a web robot... (or is DPL bot a real person?) Rolf-Peter Wille (talk) 17:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)"

In your "email," I honestly don't know if you are being sincere or "smart." As you know, there's no facial expressions or tones of voice. However, I do hope that you are being sincere in writing to me.

To answer your question, I wrote back to the "person" who wrote to me first. (The courteous thing to do, I thought.) I had not really given any thought to DPLbot being a "real" person or not. I trusted that DPLbot is at least operated or supervised by a "real" person. I have also seen others reply or leave messages for DPLbot.

When I looked deeper just now, I saw that DPLbot is "owned by" JaGa. I would hope and trust that JaGa would get any messages that I sent to DPLbot. But, I'm not sure.

My curiosity causes me to ask... how did you know that I wrote to DPLbot? And, of course, why would even care? And, why would you care about the length of my message? I am asking as sincerely as I can.

I would appreciate a reply. And, if you do, please write to me on my "talk" page. Or, notify me that I have a message from you on your talk page. That is, I don't want to use up space on DPLbot's talk page, ya know?

Thanks in advance. BeatlesVox (talk) 19:33, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again,

I finally got back on Wiki today. Thanks for your message, especially on my talk page.

I'm glad that you wrote back... thus, I see that you were indeed being sincere in your original message to me. I also trust that you understood why I was so bewildered. I had never had anyone ask me why I had written to someone. And, as I said last time, it was the very first time that DPLbot had written to me as it was the first time that I had made such a mistake when I enabled a "link" in one of my edits. After making such edits, I always go back and make sure that they are working properly. Obviously, that one time, it slipped my mind.

Yeah, I also saw that you had a similar "notification" message. So, that added to my curiosity... that is, why were you writing to me? Perhaps were sincerely asking for my advice or insight? As I'm still a "rookie" at this, asking MY advice might be a "dangerous" thing!! ("Be careful what you wish for!!") :-O

Of course, you already know that I sent a message to DPLbot after I received “his” notification. I told “him” that I was sorry for making the mistake, and, that I had fixed it. But, I haven’t heard anything back from him or his “owner,” JaGa. Gee, should I write to JaGa separately? (Rhetorical.) I’m tempted to do so. But, in “looking around” just now, it doesn’t appear that JaGa answers messages, either. Hmmm.

Well, I suppose that the “lesson” here is, if any “notifications” are received in the future, simply fix the mistake and don’t worry or take any time to reply to DPLbot, JaGa, et al, eh? “Brilliant!!”

Once again, thanks for your message.

Merry Christmas!! Rob

BeatlesVox (talk) 23:25, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DPLbot is not a real person, but plenty of the rest of us are and sometimes we read things that aren't even meant for us or that are on other people's talk pages. Anyhow, any "bot" that you write to isn't very likely to give you a response, and there's no need to send it your apologies either. It probably won't care. But it is almost always good to follow its advice or suggestions. Good luck!! KDS4444^Talk 20:00, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Rolf-Peter Wille. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rolf-Peter Wille. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rolf-Peter Wille. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sergio Fiorentino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]