User talk:Bienfuxia

Prematurely deceased entertainer categories

Hi. FYI, folks are trying again to delete the prematurely deceased entertainer categories at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 January 17#Entertainers who died.... I noticed you voted to save them in the past and thought you might want to know. :) —Wknight94 (talk) 00:14, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm afraid I really don't like the idea of canvassing for votes on people's talk pages, it seems to be clogging the deletion process up. --Sachabrunel 15:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the cleanup on Prague. I also answered your question on Talk:Franz Kafka. Pavel Vozenilek 00:57, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Britpop

Hi, I see you're working on the Britpop articles. I've left a comment on the list deletion page (agreeing with you). Rgarding Robbie Williams' inclusion on the list, I did consider removing him but on balance I felt he probably belonged. I know he was the dancer from Take That and all that, but he did ride the wave of Britpop. I don't care for the fella myself but he's a stronger keep than ludicruous inclusions such as Neds Atomic Dustbin! What do you think? --kingboyk 20:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am affraid Jarvis Cocker explained in Live Forever documentary that he as most of the Britpop peers were taking cocaine like a cup of tee. I think that all famous bands during this time took much drugs, including Blur, Oasis and Pulp, so I certainly don't know why the hell not tell it, that Jarvis was having problems with drugs, which is obviously true. Painbearer 23:23, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No edits for a while? I hope you'll be back soon. Just popped by to say good work on the Britpop list. --kingboyk 17:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CfD for Category:Films by author

I am posting this message to all participants so far in the 2007 April 22 CfD for Category:Films_by_author, because there appears to be a consensus to keep this category, and also to standardise the naming format. However there is so far no consensus on what format should be used for the standardisation. I have no opinion on any of this myself, but have suggested that this CfD be left open a little longer for discussion of the renaming, and you may wish to revisit the CfD to clarify your preferences ... otherwise I think it is likely that we will likely have anoter CfD on the same categories, which seems like avoidable duplication of effort. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Makeup.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Makeup.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Durin 14:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Micaelfoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Micaelfoster.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Pulpband.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Pulpband.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ++aviper2k7++ 03:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Make-Up pages

As pretty much the only consistent editor to The Make-Up, I thought you might like to know that The Make-Up and The Make-Up discography are both Featured Article/Featured list candidates. The nom pages can be found here and here. I'm having some difficulties getting people to look at the articles and give suggestions/vote, so I thought I'd bring it to your attention. If you could spend a few minutes to look them over and perhaps give a vote one way or the other I'd appreciate it. Thanks! Drewcifer 00:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Micaelfoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Micaelfoster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I realised we're probably going to end up in some revert war over the Klaxons discography issue, so I thought I would come talk to you about it. I have an issue with "new version", as the song is still essentially the same instrumentation and lyrics. Would you be happy with the use of "re-recorded", if we then sourced with the other two which you pointed out? Thanks for getting involved. --^{SteelersFanUK06} HereWeGo2010! 03:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, thanks very much! I'll source everything and make sure it's accurate. Happy New Year to you too! ^{SteelersFanUK06} AFCNorth2k10 22:36, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Twin Sister

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Twin Sister requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 01:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Strašnická; Luka (Prague Metro); Midnight / Choice; III (EP); Prosek (Prague Metro); California gubernatorial election, 1958; Kobylisy (Prague Metro); The Box (Orbital song); First Secretary of State; Halcyon (Orbital song); Satan Live; Avi Buffalo; Můstek (Prague Metro); Chodov (Prague Metro); California gubernatorial election, 1986; Malostranská; Depo Hostivař; Augie Galan; I. P. Pavlova

Cleanup: Permissive society; Brian Lawton; The Long Blondes
Merge: Listen Up (Oasis song); David Miliband; John Beyer
Add Sources: United Kingdom general election, 2010; Magick (song); Flora (Prague Metro)
Wikify: Steve Mackey; Upton Bishop; Gold City
Expand: Steve Coates; Breakin' (song); Prague tram system

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's going on with that

What's going on with the Holocaust deaths by occupation categories is that I nominated them for deletion based on the trivial nature of the intersection between a person's occupation and "died in the Holocaust" was a trivial intersection because none of the people were killed because of their occupation. Several editors who rarely if ever edit outside Judaism-related articles decided that deleting these categories was somehow about Judaism and made arguments about how they document anti-Semitism or the impact of the Holocaust on the arts in Europe and what-not. Not a shred of evidence was given that the occupation of any of these people was a factor in their deaths but the issue was obscured sufficiently to allow the closing admin enough cover to close them as "keep". Harley Hudson (talk) 15:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Britpop musicians

Whoops! Didn't see further down, apologies! Zarcadia (talk) 16:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

File:Numberones.JPG

Hi there Bienfuxia. I really like the graph that you uploaded to Commons displaying the number of #1s on the UK Singles Chart since 1953. I'm quite keen to see if I can get List of UK Singles Chart number ones to featured list status, and your image certainly would improve the article. I was just wondering, what source did you use for the graph? Do the numbers include songs that were #1 at the end of one year and the beginning of the next? Thanks very much. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 00:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Britpop musicians

Hi. Please stop adding the apparently non-notable and unsourced "Herr Grimm's Blaskapelle" to the list, until such a time that they have their own article which attests to their suitability for inclusion. The addition has been reverted twice now, so if you disagree, please discuss it on the article's Talk page and please do not just reinsert it again. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Gregory

Regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sandra_Gregory&oldid=prev&diff=589107319, that makes sense to me. How about adding a reference for it, so it doesn't look like unsourced content? -SpuriousQ (talk) 14:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Later... with Jools Holland episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Thompson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Later... with Jools Holland episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruben Gonzales. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Later... Episodes, Series 8

Fine contributions. Do you know if Series 8, 23 Nov 1996,

Christie Moore = Christy Moore,

Series 28, 17 Nov 2006? If so, I will change. 3nov2015 Filbino (talk) 21:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense - I've fixed it. 阝工巳几千凹父工氐 (talk) 05:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bienfuxia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bienfuxia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bienfuxia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Make-Up (group photo, 1996).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Make-Up (group photo, 1996).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Menswear" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Menswear and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 16#Menswear until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Anarchyte (talk) 07:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centuries of Sound has been accepted

Centuries of Sound, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TipsyElephant (talk) 13:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of music podcasts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elliott Wilson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]