User talk:SirFlemeingtonz

June 2020[edit]

I sited a reliable source of information on the article, and despite its sillyness, it is true, here I my source WHITCH I SITED:https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-ottoman-empires-life-or-death-race-164064882/ Anyway please check my sources before screaming about vandalism.

~~I did the first time, there is nothing about that nonsense. This is deliberate vandalism. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 04:28, 5 June 2020 (UTC)~~[reply]

You obviously did not read the source because in the first sentence it reads "The executioners of the Ottoman Empire were never noted for their mercy; just ask the teenage Sultan Osman II, who in May 1622 suffered an excruciating death by “compression of the testicles”–as contemporary chronicles put it–at the hands of an assassin known as Pehlivan the Oil Wrestler." Please do not lie about reasing my sources.

OK I rechecked it more thoroughly and I see it now. Sorry for the warns. I've restored it. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 04:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thank you sir

Hello, I'm Aspening. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2020s seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 01:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough

Byzantine Empire[edit]

Hi - re. Galleries. While they are more accepted than they once were, particularly for articles on the visual arts, we don’t tend to add them en masse. And certainly not to a Featured Article without prior discussion. Generally, galleries should be illustrating points in the article, and have accompanying text to support this. We don’t really do “picture galleries”. Hope this is helpful. KJP1 (talk) 08:05, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SirFlemeingto, yes KJP1 is right -apologies for not responding earlier- the gallery was too long and a bit unfocused and random. Sorry for the unexplained revert, I know thats never fun. Ceoil (talk) 10:20, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough I apologize for inconveniencing you.

No inconvenience at all. Enjoy your editing. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SirFlemeingtonz, these things happen, there is a steep learning curve in this place, nobody was inconvenienced, don't take to heart man. I have now about 100k edits here, but if you look at my first 1k contribs ....was often reverted, and worse ;) Ceoil (talk) 17:59, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thx!SirFlemeingtonz (talk) 18:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, SirFlemeingtonz, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

SirFlemeingtonz, good luck, and have fun. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not minor edits[edit]

M for minor edits applies for very modest edits, such as spelling or grammar corrections. David notMD (talk) 01:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What are you referring to that I did? SirFlemeingtonz (talk) 01:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A number of your edits are quite sizeable, yet you tagged them as "m" for minor. Examples include adding images. David notMD (talk) 13:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, soort SirFlemeingtonz (talk) 19:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sorry SirFlemeingtonz (talk) 19:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi SirFlemeingtonz! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, About Wikipedia Donations, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Fra Mauro Map, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 19:46, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've done it again. "This account is likely based" has no source, and reading the books and comparing them yourself is original research and not allowed. Please read WP:VERIFY. Doug Weller talk 19:40, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I found an acedemic source written by a cartigraphic historian that relates the same information as me (Nautical Charts, Texts, and Transmission: The Case of Conte di Ottomano Freducci and Fra Mauro by Chet van Duzer). may I add my edit back with this new source?

hello?

Sure. Don't forget to sign talk page posts with 4 tildes, ~~~~ and you can "ping" an editor using {{re|username}} --Doug Weller talk 16:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks SirFlemeingtonz (talk) 16:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]