User talk:Spencer.mccormick

This is Spencer.mccormick's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

JKSIC[edit]

	JKSIC
	Hi Spencer the page JKSIC that I have created is about the organization and the page u have redirected is about act . so they r quietly different Manuthaploo (talk) 07:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central administration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Computer console (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New proposals at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014[edit]

Hello. Several new proposals have been submitted at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014 since you last commented on it. You are invited to return to comment on the new proposals. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trio Hellenque[edit]

Hello,

New to this site, thanks for your help. I have this info directly from the source, the leader of Trio Hellenique & also the official fanpage which I have added. Is this ok? Hope you can help out. FNikolaidis (talk) 16:41, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have a couple of recommendations:

Use citations instead of external links; they are more visually appealing and more consistent.
Find another source – a reliable source – that verifies information on the article.

If you want, leave a note here when you're done so I can remove the tag. Thank you, Spencer.mccormick (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--

Thank you but the reliable source is the leader of Trio Hellenique, V.Nikolaidis himself that has given me this information. I am his daughter and the official facebook fanpage that I have given has been created by me with first hand info. Don't think it can get anymore reliable... Is this enough for you to approve? FNikolaidis (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, we need a way of verifying the content. Perhaps a news article would do. Spencer.mccormick (talk) 17:55, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FNikolaidis (talk) 18:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)Would this link ^[1] to the album with photo's & article's be enough? & also when you look at this: https://www.facebook.com/TrioHellenique/info you will notice I have the same last name as the leader as he is my dad & I am the admin of the pages mentioned on there. Hoping you can help me out. FNikolaidis (talk) 18:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice to have – in addition to the references you have provided – a non-facebook reference. Spencer.mccormick (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time & help! The photo album on facebook which I had uploaded is full of article's and pictures and are non-facebook related, it shows Trio Hellenique moments & article's. I can also provide you with a twitter page: https://twitter.com/TrioHellenique and a youtube page: www.youtube.com/user/TrioHellenique and this site we are in the process of setting up: http://triohellenique.webs.com/ also a google search will show many mentions of trio hellenique. Is this enough to verify the reliability? FNikolaidis (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reliability of the sources is questionable. However, I will remove the Proposed Deletion tag, replacing it with another tag that will not result in the deletion of your article in ten days. You should also consider reading the sections documentation; the article has some formatting issues. Spencer.mccormick (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FNikolaidis (talk) 18:34, 1 February 2014 (UTC)Thank you will try to get the hang of this & also find some other sources and will try to add them. Appreciate your helpFNikolaidis (talk) 18:34, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! When (and if) you have the time, I've included a few links and tips that you might be interested in:

The New Contributors' Help Page is always a good place to start;
If you have any questions, you can always ask me or contributors at the Teahouse;
You might want to consider reading the Simplified Manual of Style or parts of the the Manual of Style;
It could be helpful to familiarize yourself with our copyright policy;
Finally, when replying to threads, you can indent your post by interting a colon (:) at the beginning of your comment. This helps organize talk page posts.

Remember, be bold, but not reckless or disruptive in your editing. Also, there's no need for you to learn all of this now, as you already have a project. I wish you good editing, Spencer.mccormick (talk) 18:46, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FNikolaidis (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Had the chance to log in again today and it seems the page is up again for deletion? :( I thought you had fixed that. I am trying to enter the ref's correctly and asked help for that if maybe someone could enter them correctly for me? FNikolaidis (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes. It appears another editor added back the tag. As I had previously indicated, the Facebook references were deemed to be unreliable. I implore you: please find another non-Facebook reference, such as a news article, to reference the article. If you find one, I can add it to the article; simply drop it on my talk page. Spencer.mccormick (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Ahmad Barelvi[edit]

Hi new user here so trying to learn how to use this site. Regarding the article on syed ahmed barelvi the original article I found wasn't neutral it had terms like "brutal Sikh rule", "oppressive Sikh rule". There is no evidence for such remarks to be included in the article, and they are just subjective opinions by the previous barelvi biased article writer/editer. Therefore I added a little balance to the argument based on what I've read of this character syed barelvi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthspeaker84 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The wording felt a little unbalanced. Perhaps if you used more neutral wording instead of taking the opposite side, it would be more beneficial. For more information, see the guideline WP:NPOV. Thanks, Spencer.mccormick (talk) 01:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers[edit]

Hi Spencer.mccormick,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Spencer.mccormick. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Spencer.mccormick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Aesthetics and philosophy of art" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Aesthetics and philosophy of art has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 30 § Aesthetics and philosophy of art until a consensus is reached. - car chasm (talk) 17:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Aesthetics of art" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Aesthetics of art has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 30 § Aesthetics of art until a consensus is reached. - car chasm (talk) 17:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.255823457766520.86280.255803677768498&type=3

[1] ttps://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.255823457766520.86280.255803677768498&type=3

[1]