User talk:UITRG

UITRG, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi UITRG! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BodyWorn (June 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The purpose of a Wikipedia article is to describe, not to sell. The language in this draft is oriented to sell the camera.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BodyWorn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Utility Associates Inc (June 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not have independent reliable sources not affiliated with the company. This draft also has a promotional tone. "The Rocket makes each of your vehicles a powerful Wi-Fi hotspot, offering secure Wi-Fi up to 1500 feet around the vehicle" is in the second person, which is never used in Wikipedia and is characteristic of blatant promotion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Utility Associates Inc and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Utility Associates Inc[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Utility Associates Inc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Disclosure[edit]

Your editing history appears that the purpose of your edits is to promote Utility Associates, Inc., and one of their products. Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BodyWorn (June 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The language in this draft is now more subtly promotional than previously, but it still reads like an advertisement. If the author disagrees, and has responded to the disclosure requests, they may request the opinion of other experienced editors at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BodyWorn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Utility Associates Inc[edit]

Draft:Utility Associates Inc, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Utility Associates Inc and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Utility Associates Inc during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, UITRG, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Utility Associates Inc[edit]

Are you affiliated with Utility Associates Inc? If so, you must make the required disclosures in accordance with the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Robert McClenon. Just to make the warning above absolutely clear, if you continue to edit the article without declaring your interest, I will block this and any other accounts used to edit the article Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How do I declare my interest? I'm an intern and was asked to make a page. I've re worded everything and it is no longer promotional. This is my first time using Wikipedia. UITRG (talk) 19:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)UITRG[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Utility Associates Inc[edit]

Draft:Utility Associates Inc, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Utility Associates Inc (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Utility Associates Inc during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In case you happen to see this, please list here any of the articles for those other companies and I will certainly examine to see if they are in fact notable. SwisterTwister talk 07:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You wrote: "It's not an advertisement, it's a company page. Everything has been corrected. Can someone please contact me about this?" You were placed in a very difficult situation by your employer, who gave you instructions to do what you did not realize is completely contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. There is no such thing as a "company page" in Wikipedia. Therefore all pages placed by companies about companies are advertising. It is unfortunately very likely true that other companies have similar pages that are contrary to Wikipedia, but other stuff exists does not allow one mistake to justify another mistake. You have been given instructions for how to request a change in user name. Do not use that procedure to regain the editing privilege only to create your "company page", but otherwise to contribute to Wikipedia. It is unfortunate that your employer gave you instructions to do something that isn't permitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]