Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Image Request/Archive01

Fulfilled requests[edit]

Oil bubbler Rifleman 82 19:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Managed to get a picture: image:Oil bubbler.jpg Rifleman 82 13:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thymidine monophosphate
- image:TMP chemical structure.png
- Corrected as per discussion on Talk:Thymidine monophosphate. Do let me know if it's right/wrong now. --Rifleman 82 11:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
oxymorphone
- image:Oxymorphone.png fixed. Please check. --Rifleman 82 12:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks correct to me (conform Emolecules) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Beetstra (talk • contribs) 16:27, 13 November 2006.
Diisopropylamine - chemical structure -- Quantockgoblin 14:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn --Rifleman 82 15:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Methyl triflate - chemical structure -- Quantockgoblin 14:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn --Rifleman 82 15:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hexafluorophosphate - chemical structure -- Quantockgoblin 14:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn --Rifleman 82 15:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Magic methyl - chemical structure -- Quantockgoblin 14:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn --Rifleman 82 15:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sodium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide - better chemical structure? -- Quantockgoblin 14:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Something like Bis(trimethylsilyl)mercury? --Rifleman 82 15:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Call me a stickler but I think should be bent, not linear. Oddly now that you point it out I think Bis(trimethylsilyl)mercury should be linear on Hg not bent i.e. it should have a structure like dimethylmercury! And, thanks for drawing them -- Quantockgoblin 15:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Rifleman 82 - I spotted a typo in Sodium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide, need to changes "S" to "Si" - and you're doing a great job -- Quantockgoblin 15:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, fixed both. --Rifleman 82 15:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
1-Bromohexane - chemical structure -- Quantockgoblin 14:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn -- Quantockgoblin 10:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Formamidiumium - chemical structure -- Quantockgoblin 14:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn -- Quantockgoblin 10:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tetraaminoethylene - general chemical structure -- Quantockgoblin 14:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn -- Quantockgoblin 10:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Trifluoromethyl - general chemical structure -- Quantockgoblin 14:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn -- Quantockgoblin 13:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Allhin condenser Rifleman 82 19:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn - see Allhin_consesor.png -- Quantockgoblin 20:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NMR tube - flame sealed and septum Rifleman 82 22:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Do either of these suffice?

--Ed (Edgar181) 15:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They look good to me --Quantockgoblin 11:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that! I've assessed the article now. Would you agree? I'm not sure what else can possibly be added at the moment. --Rifleman 82 02:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Phosphine oxide - OPR₃ for the titled article --Quantockgoblin 12:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn see below --Quantockgoblin 16:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Phosphinite - P(OR)R₂ for the titled article --Quantockgoblin 12:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn see below --Quantockgoblin 16:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Phosphonite - P(OR)₂R for the titled article --Quantockgoblin 12:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn see below --Quantockgoblin 16:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Phosphite - P(OR)₃ for the titled article --Quantockgoblin 12:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn see below --Quantockgoblin 16:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Phosphinate - OP(OR)R₂ for the titled article --Quantockgoblin 12:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn see below --Quantockgoblin 16:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Phosphonate - OP(OR)₂R for the titled article --Quantockgoblin 12:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn see below --Quantockgoblin 16:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Phosphate - OP(OR)₃ for the titled article --Quantockgoblin 12:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Drawn see below --Quantockgoblin 16:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How are these? --Ed (Edgar181) 15:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ed They are great - thanks for drawing them! The only improvement I could suggest is that instead of drawing the trivalent P-compounds as planer, you could draw them as tetrahedral with a lone pair as the final axis. --Quantockgoblin 18:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ed, also I think it is more clear if the 1, 2 and 3 of the R-groups are given in superscript e.g. R¹, R² and R³ - subscript implies number of substituents.

Good suggestions. I've made the changes. --Ed (Edgar181) 12:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Job done! --Quantockgoblin 16:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sodium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide structure wrong

Fixed --Quantockgoblin 11:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naringin structure wrong

Fixed --Ed (Edgar181) 22:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Structure of MES, see [2-N-morpholino]ethanesulfonic acid. --HappyCamper 17:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is:

--Ed (Edgar181) 13:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ed! --HappyCamper 04:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tetralin - chemical structure --Quantockgoblin 12:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- How's this? Fvasconcellos 15:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Great -Quantockgoblin 15:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a remark about wrong picture on retinoid
- Corrected. Fvasconcellos 15:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect image in Proflavine (see talk:Proflavine
- Fixed --Rifleman 82 02:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

azobisisobutyronitrile, rxn should produce two radicals (per Talk:Azobisisobutylonitrile). --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 08:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Corrected. --Rifleman 82 12:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pasteur pipette, plastic and glass. Commons only has the plastic one, and that doesn't look very nice either. Rifleman 82 22:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Provided by User:Beliason
A rubber policeman. --HappyCamper 22:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Provided by User:Beliason

Bis-tris propane, apparently structure is wrong (per Talk:Bis-tris propane). --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 11:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Corrected. I asked User:Benjah-bmm27 if he would do the 3D version. --Rifleman 82 13:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - 3D done by User:Benjah-bmm27 --Rifleman 82 17:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Eicosanoid#Biosynthesis (end of section) could use a diagram showing how the prostaglandins, thromboxanes and prostacyclin are derived from PGH. The Lipid Library's Prostanoid page can be a model, particularly its 2nd and 4th diagrams. David.Throop 22:07, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~I think I'll tackle this one, and post a link to the file here when I'm done just to make sure it's what you had in mind. It might take me a while, though—I hope that's OK.~~ Done—Image:Prostanoid synthesis.svg. Fvasconcellos 00:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ylidic/reasonance structures of Stable carbenes e.g. R¹R²N-C:-NR³R⁴ ↔ R^{1^{R²N⁺=C^--NR³R⁴}}

How's this?:

Great, thanks. Quantockgoblin 10:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Levulinic acid has a carbon too much. Reported on talkpage. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 22:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 00:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Trimesic acid (benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid). Quantockgoblin 10:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 00:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - Quantockgoblin 10:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thiocarbanilide
- Thiocarbanilide done. If you'd like a ball-and-stick model I'll upload one. Fvasconcellos 14:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - Quantockgoblin 16:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Structure of Calendic acid. – David.Throop 00:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 01:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Structures for Vaccenic acid and Rumenic acid? I put the cows there, and I like the cows, but a structure would be better. :-) David.Throop 23:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Both done: and . I'd get rid of the cows, but I'd rather let you do it :) If you'd like me to change the rotation or add stereo descriptors that's OK. BTW I promise I'm done monopolizing the requests now :) Fvasconcellos 00:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  I just replaced them! --HappyCamper 04:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fvasconcellos, I think it is great that you are drawing the requested images. Just on an aesthetic point, I think you could make the images more compact by having the alkyl chains bend back on themselves to form a sort of "U" shape (on its side), rather than a sort of "L" shape (on its side) i.e. for the above image as well as for Calendic acid. Quantockgoblin 13:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - OK, I hadn't thought of that. Remember to purge your cache if the new versions aren't displaying, they might look "funky" for a while. Fvasconcellos 14:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - Great - keep up the good work! Quantockgoblin 14:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Eleostearic acid? – David.Throop 18:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 19:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Thanks for quick service! David.Throop 03:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added images to these:
- Glucoside- Quantockgoblin 13:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Furanolactone - Quantockgoblin 13:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indoline (... with numbering ?) - Quantockgoblin 13:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 21:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Great thanks - Quantockgoblin 23:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Isoindoline (... with numbering ?) - Quantockgoblin 13:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 21:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Great thanks - Quantockgoblin 23:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Isobutyramide functional group : -NH-CO-CH(CH₃)₂ - Quantockgoblin 14:24, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 21:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Great thanks - Quantockgoblin 23:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sodium metabisulfite - could use a line model

Done - see article. Ben 16:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bisthiosemicarbazone (H2NHC(=S)NN=C(R1)-R2-C(R3)=NNHC(=S)NH2.)- Quantockgoblin 13:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done by Ben
Oxindole (... with numbering ?) - Quantockgoblin 13:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. --Ed (Edgar181) 12:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Carbazole (... with numbering ?) - Quantockgoblin 13:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--(Edgar181) 17:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Ed[reply]

- - - Great thanks - Quantockgoblin 23:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - I think the above may be numbered according to indole and not carbazole. I think the numbering starts (e.g. 1) from the C-H next to the Nitrogen and works round the rings back to Nitrogen. The quaternary atoms are not numbered, such that the Nitrogen atom has the numbering of 9. See http://www.chemexper.com/index.shtml?main=http://www.chemexper.com/search/cas/86-74-8.html -- Quantockgoblin 11:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - Yes, I've seen carbazoles numbered two ways. I made the numbering in the picture constent with the text of the article. You are right that this is not IUPAC numbering. I guess it would be best to change both the text and the image to reflect the more standard numbering system. I'll get to it today. --Ed (Edgar181) 12:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - I've now renumbered in the image. --Ed (Edgar181) 12:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Great! - Quantockgoblin 15:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nicotinamide -- Quantockgoblin 15:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I created that image earlier for the niacin page. Good idea creating a separate page for it. --Ed (Edgar181) 16:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iminium cation ([R¹R²C=NR³R⁴]⁺), for that wiki page.

Done! Ben 13:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Punicic acid, currently in my sandbox at User:David.Throop/Punicic_acid? David.Throop 21:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 13:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prolinol -- Quantockgoblin 15:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 13:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Thanks -- Quantockgoblin 21:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
D-Prolinol -- Quantockgoblin 15:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 13:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Thanks -- Quantockgoblin 21:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
L-Prolinol -- Quantockgoblin 15:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 13:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Thanks -- Quantockgoblin 21:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- Quantockgoblin 10:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thiazole - would like to see the image with numbering (e.g. S=1, N=3 + ring) -- Quantockgoblin 18:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
benzothiazole - would like to see the image with numbering (e.g. S=1, N=3 + ring) -- Quantockgoblin 18:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How about these?

--Ed (Edgar181) 18:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-- Job well done thanks -- Quantockgoblin 21:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~thiopene, with numbering please~~ -- Quantockgoblin 18:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~benzothiopene, with numbering please~~ -- Quantockgoblin 18:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Not thiophene and benzothiophene? Fvasconcellos 18:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, I think you are correct - jobs deleted -- Quantockgoblin 21:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Quaternary ammonium cation - would like to see this as tetrahedral not drawn flat -- Quantockgoblin 18:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How's this? Fvasconcellos 00:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - - done thanks -- Quantockgoblin 08:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
benzothiophene, would like this numbered, thanks -- Quantockgoblin 21:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Fvasconcellos 00:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - - done thanks -- Quantockgoblin 08:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Isonicotinamide (pyridine-4-carboxamide), thanks -- Quantockgoblin 11:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Here it is: --Ed (Edgar181) 14:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the numbering on the following need to be corrected:

,

I don't think the non-CH's should be given a new number, see Benzothiazole for an example:

Heh. That's ChemSketch's auto numbering, not IUPAC numbering :/ I'll renumber them manually and change the orientation as well. Fvasconcellos 14:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and whilst you're at it ... nice pretty 3D pic to go with them? -- Quantockgoblin 14:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, corrected. I've tried to follow the rules but I'd still like them double-checked, just in case I screwed up again :) 3D models to come.

Tremendous - for a moment I though the Isoindoline was wrong but a Google image search agrees with you, and nice link to the naming rules - Quantockgoblin 16:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. 3D models updated for indoline/isoindoline and created for benzothiophene, benzothiazole, benzoxazole and thiazole:

, , , Fvasconcellos 18:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done Fvasconcellos, I've updated the wiki pages with images, thanks --Quantockgoblin 09:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terthiophene

How's this? Again, numbering was done by a human :), so please double check.

Fvasconcellos 14:12, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, that's 2,2':5',2''-terthiophene, the one described in the terthiophene infobox. There are plenty of other isomers, but I thought this should be the one. Fvasconcellos 14:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Looks good to me -- Quantockgoblin 17:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Benzoxazole - I'd like to get the ring numbering on this please! - Quantockgoblin 14:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Benzisoxazole

Both done.

Fvasconcellos 18:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dioxolane

1,3-dioxolane done

Fvasconcellos 17:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both done.

I believe Ben has done 3D models of these already. Fvasconcellos 18:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A column chromatography setup for column chromatography
- I'll see if I can do a schematic representation like I did for recrystallization for this job, if that is agreeable -- Quantockgoblin 09:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've done this , but there are other on commons -- Quantockgoblin 22:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
simple chromatograms for Gas chromatography V8rik 16:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- V8rik, I should have a few GC traces which I could scan in, however they might not be of the highest quality - would that be acceptable? --Quantockgoblin 10:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Quantockgoblin, why not publish them here so we can have a look? V8rik 22:38, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've just looked at commons and there is: -- Quantockgoblin 22:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Many thanks for pointing me towards these images, I have put them to work in chromatography and Van Deemter's equation because they are the introductionary pages. V8rik 21:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sublimer with product on the cold-finger. I going to try to get a photo of this.--Smokefoot 21:11, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I have a photo of the cold finger at image:Cold finger 1.jpg but it's no product. Rifleman 82 17:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've made a schematic representation of a coldfinger sublimation setup - see image:Sublimation_apparatus.png. However, I'm not sure if this section is for photos only, or whether 2D-representations are also acceptable? -- Quantockgoblin 17:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Absolutely! Nice work too. --HappyCamper 17:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image of prostacyclin has one too many carbons in it - there's an extra one between the ring structure and the -COOH terminal. David.Throop 16:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Corrected. Please check, before I move to commons. Remember to flush your cache. --Rifleman 82 17:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Many thanks David.Throop 16:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]