User talk:97ytkljgg789

Welcome[edit]

Hello, 97ytkljgg789, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to become a productive contributor. Your contributions are easily tracked and monitored. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

97ytkljgg789, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi 97ytkljgg789! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Your recent editing history at Spengler's civilization model shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. SFK2 (talk) 07:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

97ytkljgg789, you need to stop spamming Spengler's Civ Model[edit]

Your (anti-Asian, anti-Semitic) Original Research is not allowed on Wikipedia. It violates the rules and simply must go.

Please stop[edit]

The content that you're adding into Spengler's civilization model is not appropriate. It seems to have little connection to the model and is instead a collection of synthesis, fiction, and WP:COATRACK. Please stop, and discuss the problem on the article's talkpage. If you keep on edit-warring to reinsert such problematic content, you may get blocked. bobrayner (talk) 08:38, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 18:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

coming back from a short block to continue the behavior that led to your initial block will lead to another block. Please discuss your proposed content on the talk page before attempting to restore it again. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]