User talk:Anujbajrangi205

December 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Siddhanta Mahapatra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 13:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Siddhanta Mahapatra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 14:38, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Siddhanta Mahapatra. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 02:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Siddhanta Mahapatra. Materialscientist (talk) 02:53, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can she rachana banerjee wiki it never mention she married to siddhanta mahapatra how can wiki editor add rachana as his wife delete ot[edit]

It's completely wrong reference site that claiming rachana never married to siddhant mahapatra cheap publicity stunt with fake article Anujbajrangi205 (talk) 02:58, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a source. Meters (talk) 05:45, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Siddhanta Mahapatra. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Viridae ^{DON'T PANIC} 08:57, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Dhtwiki. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sidhant Mohapatra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dhtwiki (talk) 14:30, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sidhant Mohapatra. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 16:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked before for doing exactly this on this same article. Stop. You will end up blocked again if this continues. Ravensfire (talk) 16:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Daman (2022 film). Ravensfire (talk) 18:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've continued to make edits without sources, use poor writing that's nearly impossible to read and adding easter egg links. STOP. That does not help improve the articles. You're using poor quality sources (izeans.com? Not a reliable source) and sources for other people (a source that's entirely Salman Khan is NOT a good source for a page on Sidhant Mohapatra when they aren't mentioned there!). Any further edits like this and I will ask for you to be blocked from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Geniac (talk) 06:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:LoVleyAhmed per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dismant39. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]