User talk:Bcarere

Hello! Thanks for your note. Have you previously edited under a different user name or in collaboration with another user or a group of users? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:32, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dlohcierekim:. Thanks for your response. While I was working for the same agency, I was asked to make a second account using a coworker's email after the article I made using my personal account was rejected twice. Under the different user name, the same article was submitted for approval and, of course, rejected. That was my last involvement with the article and second account. I no longer have the login info, but I could try to find it if it would be helpful. I've never collaborated with other users. Again, I'm recounting these activities with regret and an understanding that it was an abuse of Wikipedia's guidelines. Thanks again for your response and consideration. Bcarere (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say, as a first step, you'll need to disclose employer and client for all paid edits you have made on Wikipedia. I'm also troubled by the admission that you knowingly violated our policies (and, by extension, the Terms of Use). The fact that you're apparently not the only person from your (former) agency ignoring Wikipedia's policies doesn't quite help. It would help if you could explain what edits we can expect from you if you're unblocked, both in general terms and specifically on the Surrealism article. Huon (talk) 01:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bcarere, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bcarere! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dom Marcell (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dom Marcell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dom Marcell (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying the applied notability standards and notability cannot be inherited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dom Marcell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bcarere (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I previously worked at a marketing agency, and part of my job was to create Wikipedia content for clients. It was my first time contributing/editing Wikipedia content, and though I knew I was going against the site's guidelines, I didn't fully grasp the unethically of my actions, and I regret my behaviour in retrospect. I've since stopped working for the agency, and I'd love to have a second chance to contribute. I didn't realize I was blocked until I noticed an error in an article about Surrealism and logged-in to see if I could help amend it. If it is possible to discuss lifting the block, I'm available to talk anytime. Many thanks.Bcarere (talk) 22:30, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Awaiting response to Huon's note HERE -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Draft:Dom Marcell concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dom Marcell, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dom Marcell

Hello, Bcarere. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dom Marcell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]